On the Poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko

On the Poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko

The “poetician, not politician” always seemed conscious of the Russian adage that a great writer is more than a writer—he is a second government.


On a cold night in 1986, my husband Stephen Cohen and I were speeding through Moscow in a car driven by Yevgeny Yevtushenko. Zhenya, as we called him, was pulled over by the traffic police. As we waited, our friend grew increasingly anxiousand not about the consequences of his driving. 

At that moment, he was nervous about the possibility that the authorities might search his car and discover in the trunk his copies of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago, still banned in the Soviet Union but published in Russian abroad.  

Looking back thirty years later, we might think glasnost, a new era of openness, was already inevitable. But the truth is that for those who lived and struggled through that time, change was far from certain. Even after the determined reformer Mikhail Gorbachev emerged as Soviet leader in March 1985, his policy of ending censorship unfolded slowly, in fits and starts. Indeed, it took nearly three years for people to understand that major changes were afoot. As a globally renowned poet, Zhenya was a key messenger of the new unfolding reality.

Many now know of his death last Saturday, and of his remarkable life. We have read about the indelible role he played in Russia’s history and cultural progress in the countless obituaries in prominent papers that have been written.

But what is less understood is the man who was, as he liked to say, “a poetician, not a politician.” With the instincts of one whose family (both grandfathers) had suffered at the hands of Stalin, Zhenya was a humanist of civic courage and often an incurable romanticthe outsized, swashbuckling kind. (He even played one of the Three Musketeers in a movie he directed.) The life he lived was that of a true Russian patriot, someone who felt a personal responsibility to fight for progress and against what he called “social passivity.”  

Back then, Russia’s future seemed uncertain. But Zhenya imagined a brighter path for his homeland, including a better relationship with the United States. Perhaps that’s why he spent decades cultivating his own connection with America, eventually living, working, and teaching here, while also spending months a year at his beloved wooden dacha in Peredelkino, a writers’s compound outside Moscow (where he asked to be buried), and continuing to read his poetry to large crowds in packed stadiums across post-Soviet Russia and, indeed, around the world. (As was often said, he was the world’s most famous poet for several decades.)

The Nation was privileged to feature his work over the years. It ranged from a piece, “The Fascist Boot in Minnesota,” for our 120th-anniversary issue, to his poem “The Loss,” which appeared in The Best of The Nation (1990-2000), to a wonderfully sentimental and somewhat ironic poem about Steve and our family on Steve’s “jubilee” birthday.

Throughout our decades-long friendship, I came to know a man acutely aware of the role of the artist as more than an observer. Zhenya understood that his fate, and that of Russian culture itself, were inextricably linked to the fate of his countryand this inspired his role during the remarkable years of glasnost and perestroika.

Indeed, from his emergence on the public stage in the 1950s, Zhenya always seemed conscious of the Russian adage that a great writer is more than a writer.  He is a second government. Two among many of his poems certainly had an enormous political impact: “The Heirs of Stalin”a warning against a return to Stalinism and a fervent defense of the embattled Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev’s anti-Stalinist policies of the early 1960s; and “Babi Yar,” his poetic response of 1961 to Soviet officials’ refusal to erect a monument to the tens of thousands of Jews killed in a 1941 Nazi massacre in Kiev. In sharp, bare language, he called on his fellow Russians to see themselves in the dead:

There are no monuments over Babi Yar. 
But the sheer cliff is like a rough tombstone.
It horrifies me.
Today, I am as old
As the Jewish people.
It seems to me now,
That I, too, am a Jew.

In a book of interviews Steve and I published in 1990, Voices of Glasnost, Zhenya spoke of how the poetry and art of his generation laid the ground for Gorbachev’s glasnost:

Don’t think that glasnost or perestroika dropped from the sky or that it was given to us by the Politburo. It was many years in preparation. The new generation of leaders absorbed the spirit of our literature. They were students when we began reading our poems in the 1950s. They squeezed onto the balconies of our poetry readings without tickets.

Perhaps that’s why Zhenya not only protested the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968, and used his semi-official standing to defend persecuted artists and other dissidents, but also foughtand fought early—for books, films, and plays that had been suppressed, notably his friend Anatoly Rybakov’s anti-Stalinist Children of the Arbat. Zhenya rallied fellow writers and other allies, gathered signatures, organized campaigns, and brought samizdat out of the drawer. As he put it:

My generation of poets did a lot to break down the Iron Curtain. We cut up our bare hands assaulting that curtain. Sometimes we won, sometimes we lost. Sometimes there were tactical retreats and sometimes we lay on the ground after a hail of insults. But our literature didn’t come as a gift from the so-called upstairs. We worked for it. We forged it for ourselves and for future generations.

No wonder Zhenya had no use for abject conformism, no patience for indifference, and no tolerance for violations of humanity.

And yet despite the pressure of churning politics and shifting social attitudes, he never succumbed to extremism in either direction. At a time of worsening relations between Russia and the United States, when leaders and pundits fuel mistrust and recriminations, his romanticism might have seemed naïve. But he was clear-eyed about the obstacles. We would be wise to resurrect Zhenya’s Cold War–era wisdom:

Your hard-liners explain their position by saying there are hard-liners in the Soviet Union. And our hard-liners are trying to close our openness, our democratization, because they are waving this image of American hard-liners. So they both need each other… it is a very dangerous game that they’re playing; they are practically sawing off the branch on which they are sitting.

Later, with poetic precision, he called out a contradiction in America’s own politics. “Just like our reactionaries, your reactionaries need the image of a bogeyman… You love our liberals… but you don’t like your own liberals. You should support your local liberals, too,” he said with a provocateur’s grin.  

Zhenya saw his work as “human rights poetry; the poetry which defends human conscience as the greatest spiritual value.” That is the lesson of his most famous poem, “Babi Yar,” a lesson worth remembering today, as Ukraine’s government and its right-wing allies whitewash the Nazi collaborators who helped carry out the atrocity.

While the poem is celebrated for its raw imagery, halfway through the brutal account shines a ray of hope: “I know the kindness of my native land.”

In that one line is all you need to know about the great artist, about an extraordinary life, about our dear friend, Yevgeny Yevtushenko–a man of passion and soul who, until the very end, believed in the humanity in each of us and was determined to change the world accordingly. 

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy