Obama Budget Would Maintain Pell Grant… but Cut Two Programs

Obama Budget Would Maintain Pell Grant… but Cut Two Programs

Obama Budget Would Maintain Pell Grant… but Cut Two Programs

What would Obama’s budget proposal mean for students?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

This post was originally published at the invaluable StudentActivist.net.
 
President Obama’s new budget proposes some $10 billion a year in Pell Grant cuts, but looks to achieve that goal without reducing the maximum grant or dropping any students from the program. They’re doing that by seeking Pell savings in two areas — summer grants and graduate loan interest.

Summer Pell Grants are a recent addition to the Pell program, under which students can apply for a second grant for summer school if their total courseload adds up to more than a full academic year’s worth. The summer Pells are new, as I said, and they’ve been popular — so popular that they’re costing quite a bit more than anticipated. Obama is proposing eliminating them.

The second cut is to graduate loan interest subsidies. Right now, while you’re in grad school, your federal student loans don’t accrue interest — they just sit there, at the amount you borrowed them, waiting for you to be done. Under Obama’s budget plan, that would end, and though you still wouldn’t be paying back the loans while you’re in school, the amount you borrowed would be growing due to interest accrued during your studies.

The administration says that by making these two changes, they can keep eligibility for the larger Pell program steady while maintaining the recent hike to the maximum grant while cutting as much as $100 billion from the program’s cost over the next ten years.

 

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x