NYC Students Meet at City Hall to Debate Guns

NYC Students Meet at City Hall to Debate Guns

NYC Students Meet at City Hall to Debate Guns

As millions around the world participated in the March for Our Lives, 35 children aged 8 to 10 took turns sharing their reasons for restricting gun use.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This article is reposted with permission from Kings County Politics.

As millions around the world participated in last Saturday’s March for Our Lives rally, about 35 children aged 8 to 10 participated in a debate at City Hall on whether guns should be restricted.

The discussion was organized by the Brooklyn chapter of Jack and Jill of America, a mother-led organization that engages in community service. Michelle Cornegy, whose husband is City Council member Robert Cornegy Jr. (Bedford-Stuyvesant, Northern Crown Heights), highlighted how the organization offers resources for children of color. The councilmember made an appearance at the event to support recent anti–gun violence efforts.

“Our mission is to grow and to grow leaders,” she said.

Last year, children debated whether circuses should keep using performing animals. The debate featured a special appearance from Mayor Bill de Blasio. This year’s topic was chosen because of the recent debate around guns.

After several kids volunteered for the side for which they would argue, they began to write their speeches—with their parents offering guidance—on large index cards for the discussion held that afternoon. A few parents offered their help, such as Kenya Johnson.

Johnson found the event format helpful in teaching kids issues at an early age, especially for her special-needs child, Jeremiah.

“It’s wonderful that children in America have gotten civically engaged, and we could only hope that it makes a difference,” she said.

Tracy Wright, another mother, noted that her son Kaden already had an idea for his position for why guns are harmful. She too found the debate format helpful as an educative tool for children to express their opinions.

“I hope this is the seed for kids to come to City Hall and talk about issues,” she said.

US Representative Yvette Clarke (D-Crown Heights, Flatbush, East Flatbush, Brownsville, Sheepshead Bay) stopped by to deliver some comments to the students before the short debate. She asked them questions on a variety of topics, including where the House of Representatives is located and how they might work for change in their schools.

Clarke understood how important it was to ensure passage of legislation in response to the shootings happening across the country. She noted that in 2003, while she was a City Council member, an individual fatally shot her Brooklyn colleague James Davis.

“This man was loved by everybody, and his life was taken by gun violence. So when I go to Washington, DC, I get upset as well,” Clarke said.

Cornegy also commended the children for their efforts not only in forming their arguments, but also in informing public leaders like himself on issues like gun control.

“What you do here today actually informs the way I perform, the way the congresswoman performs on your behalf,” he said.

Before the short debate, the ninth-district leader said there does exist a demand to pass laws in Congress. She acknowledged the resistance from Republican lawmakers on bringing any gun-related legislation to the floor. Yet she felt hopeful a change would happen soon.

“As we build, as all of these folks who believe like we do, we know in the end we’re going to prevail. We’re going to bring legislation that’s going to change lives,” Clarke said.

The kids then took turns to share their reasons on whether guns should be restricted. Some argued that they could be used for self-defense, while those against highlighted that they present a danger to the public.

They were unanimous and enthusiastic in supporting at least one issue—eating pizza after the debate.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x