Kristina Rizga on harnessing young voters’ energy, Stephen Duncombe on a spoof edition of the New York Times



Volunteering in record numbers, young people became the superforce of the Obama campaign. Now many progressives hope that these youths’ campaign experiences will inspire a lifetime of community service. That’s why



magazine partnered to kick off

You Voted. Now What?

–a series highlighting some of our nation’s most inspiring young activists. We begin with an overview of the political landscape in which young people can continue their activism.

Be like Obama: become a community organizer. There are more than 600 youth-led community organizations working on creating green jobs, making college more affordable and organizing for immigrants’ rights, among many other issues.

, a database of youth activism, offers an easy way to search, by region, for campaigns under way. If you’re looking at community organizing as a career, there are fellowships that offer financial support at some of the most effective progressive organizations:


Center for Community Change


Young People For



Center for Progressive Leadership




Join the national service. In a campaign speech at the University of Colorado, Obama extolled the virtues of serving one’s nation and community. What would this service look like?


partners with nonprofit and faith-based organizations to work on issues ranging from public education to environmental cleanup. The

Peace Corps

, established by John F. Kennedy, sends volunteers around the globe to work with governments, schools, nonprofits and entrepreneurs.

Teach for America

recruits recent college graduates to teach for two years in schools in low-income communities. And


provides education, counseling and job skills to low-income young Americans.

Become a politician. At 27,

Tony Payton

is the youngest member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. At 23,

Andrew Gillum

was elected to serve on the Tallahassee City Commission. Payton and Gillum represent the growing number of young elected leaders who want to speak for underrepresented communities. Eighteen- to 35-year-olds represent more than 20 percent of the population but only 4.8 percent of all government seats nation- wide. Several programs hope to change that. The

Center for Progressive Leadership

recruits promising leaders from disempowered communities and connects them to organizations through paid internships and fellowships. The

Young Elected Officials Network

provides ongoing personal development and professional support for young elected officials.   KRISTINA RIZGA


On November 12 tens of thousands of New Yorkers were handed a free copy of the New York Times on their way to work. It looked and felt like the paper of record, but above a photo of military helicopters flying into the sunset a headline read, Iraq War Ends. By the end of the day it was revealed that this “special edition” of the Times was a prank coordinated by artist/activists

Andy Bichlbaum

of the

Yes Men


Steven Lambert

of the

Anti-Advertising Agency


But to dismiss the paper as merely an amusing prank is to underestimate the seriousness of its purpose. The articles are frequently funny, but the politics are sincere. Nation Sets Its Sights on Building Sane Economy, reads one headline; All Public Universities to Be Free, reads another. Even the ads are hopeful:


extols “Peace. An idea the world can profit from,” and


sells ladybugs for pest control. This edition of the Times, as the motto states, contains “All the News We Hope to Print.”

“None of this is currently true,” Lambert says, “but it’s all possible.” Early on, the planners of the paper decided to eschew the familiar model of liberal lament about how bad things are. “The challenge isn’t to make people think that the war is a bad idea, since most people already do,” Bichlbaum explains. “The challenge is to make people feel it can be over now.” In order to provoke a visceral experience of political possibility, the artists and their collaborators created what might be described as an artifact of the potential future (the newspaper is dated July 4, 2009). Bichlbaum continues, “We wanted people to read this and say to themselves, What if?”

For forty years the dreams of conservatives have set the parameters of possibility in this country. Liberals, finally in power, need to exercise their atrophied imagination. The Times prank is exactly the sort of activist practice we need to rekindle our creativity and set up a new line of progressive thinking that begins with the question: What if?   STEPHEN DUNCOMBE


Canadian Prime Minister

Stephen Harper

didn’t skip a beat after

Barack Obama

was elected president; on November 5 he proposed a joint US-Canada pact on climate change. “We need a partner in the matters of the environment if we want to make real progress,” Harper argued. His climate-change pact, however, has less to do with curbing global warming than with protecting Canada’s status as America’s leading oil supplier, specifically that massively profitable reservoir of “dirty oil” known as the Alberta tar sands.

America’s privileged access to Canadian oil is guaranteed under NAFTA’s “proportionality clause,” which obligates Canada to export two-thirds of its oil directly to the United States, almost all of which is extracted from the Alberta tar sands. The largest industrial project in history, the tar sands have drawn nearly $100 billion in investments from companies like







Imperial Oil

. An environmental nightmare, it uses vast amounts of water and energy and emits up to three times more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than conventional oil extraction. Harper’s proposed pact would exempt Alberta’s “dirty oil” (as Obama’s senior energy adviser

Jason Grumet

has described it) from potentially tough new climate-change regulations implied by Obama’s promise to shift away from carbon-intensive fuels.

Obama also promised during the campaign to move the United States toward energy independence. Secure access to a North American energy supply like Alberta’s dirty oil would help achieve that goal. But in this case, energy independence and clean energy aren’t the same thing. So how will Obama respond to Harper’s proposal? Stay tuned…   BRETT STORY

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that moves the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories to readers like you.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy