A New Southern Strategy

A New Southern Strategy

The midterm elections proved to Democrats that the South must not be written off. The key to winning rural and working-class voters in Dixie is the same as anywhere else.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Just one year ago–even a few months ago–the unanimous view among the Democrats’ strategic sages was that the only drama in the South this fall would be whether the region’s few remaining statewide Democratic officeholders could hold on to their jobs. Could Senator Bill Nelson hold off Katherine Harris, America’s tackiest theocrat, in Florida? Could Governor Phil Bredesen show his conservative cojones by cutting enough folks off state healthcare to hold on in ultra-red Tennessee?

After the 2004 wipeout of five Democratic Senate seats in the South, many national Democrats were pleased to think that their long-running debate–can we win in Dixie, and should we even try?–had been settled. Settled in the negative, that is. Thomas Schaller’s recent book, Whistling Past Dixie, brought together years’ worth of poll-tested memoranda in calling for the Democratic Party to kiss off the nation’s largest region.

On November 7 the South–a k a Jesusland–showed how wrong that conclusion was. If the Senate lands in Democratic hands, it will be thanks in large part to Claire McCaskill’s triumph in Missouri and to Jim Webb’s prevailing in the recount in Virginia over the man who was once conservatives’ great hope for the White House in 2008. It will not be thanks to the candidate who ran the sort of Southern campaign the sages called “perfect”–Harold Ford Jr. in Tennessee, who went far beyond triangulation and out-Republicaned his opponent with hard lines on gay marriage, immigration, national defense, guns and an array of Bible quotes that could whip John Ashcroft in a holiness contest any day.

McCaskill, a sharp-tongued former prosecutor, and Webb, a tough-as-beef-jerky former GOP Naval Secretary, are nobody’s idea of wild-eyed liberals. But they both ran campaigns that stubbornly bucked conventional wisdom. Running against hard-core Christian-conservative incumbents, neither triangulated. They were unwaveringly prochoice; called for sharp changes in Iraq policy; opposed anti-gay marriage hoo-ha (Virginia) and stem-cell nonsense (Missouri); and ran as old-fashioned, blue-collar, labor-embracing economic populists. “Once again,” McCaskill said in her victory speech, “the Democratic Party has claimed Harry Truman’s Senate seat for the working people of Missouri.”

For the working people. It’s a sequence of words Democrats have continued to mouth, but it’s been a long time since anybody living in anything smaller than a McMansion had much call to believe it. McCaskill and Webb took their campaigns directly into the Republicans’ working-class strongholds. In the Bible Belt Ozarks of southern Missouri, McCaskill emphasized her blue-collar message without running away from her progressive positions. Stumping hard in southwest Virginia, conservative hill country that has provided Republicans with their statewide margins for three decades, Webb did not thicken his accent or excise the Marx and Engels references from his speeches. He spoke to folks in the same tone, with the same messages, that he used in liberal urban strongholds.

Even the Ford defeat, in which race-baiting played a major role, has something to teach. Yes, the old prejudices remain shockingly strong. But there is also the fact that in a supposedly solid-red Southern state, an African-American Democrat from a well-known, ethically challenged (and liberal) political family nearly beat a conservative Republican for a US Senate seat. A whole lot of white Tennesseans voted for their first black person for a major office; a whole lot of others considered it for the first time. It will never be as hard for them to pull that trigger again.

No message from the midterm election should ring more loudly than this: The South must not be written off. The key to winning the votes of rural and working-class people in Dixie is the same as everywhere else. Nobody said it better than that great Southern activist, Strange Fruit author Lillian Smith. A vote, she wrote in Killers of the Dream, is a small thing to give to a person who has shown you respect.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x