Nate Chinen’s Daring New History of Modern Jazz

Nate Chinen’s Daring New History of Modern Jazz

Jazz’s Second Century

Nate Chinen’s new book confronts the contemporary jazz moment with clarity and authority.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

However the conversation is framed—in the terms of connoisseurship, classicism, nostalgia, or sheer geekdom—a great deal of the public discourse on jazz tends to be fixed on the past. The unearthing of obscure recordings by historical masters such as John Coltrane or Thelonious Monk is celebrated as a major development. Critics measure new artists in relation to the old, reserving their highest praise for those who remind them most of Miles Davis or Billie Holiday. In New Orleans, the ostensible birthplace of jazz, the annual big-tent event is called the Jazz and Heritage Festival, reinforcing the link between the music and history by branding it. What is the heritage of New Orleans without jazz? And what is jazz if not a heritage?

Actually, as the music is created by a sizable number of musicians working today, jazz is something other than—and maybe something more than—a heritage. It is a way to confront the particulars of the present day and give voice to what it feels like (and sounds like) to live in a time of seemingly endless access and cultural volatility. While some jazz critics are at home in the present (I’d like to think of myself as one of them), no writer has confronted the of-this-moment character of contemporary jazz with the clarity and authority that Nate Chinen has brought to it, first in his journalism and now in a daring and illuminating book, Playing Changes.

Chinen, a former critic for The New York Times, now oversees editorial content at the jazz radio station WBGO. But while on his beat for the paper, he was delighted to discover that jazz is very much a living form, stylistically capacious and mercurial. He found cross-cultural variety in the music of the Benin-born guitarist Lionel Loueke and the Puerto Rican saxophonist Miguel Zenon. He found polyglot genre-twisting in the music of the bassist and vocalist Esperanza Spalding and the saxophonist Kamasi Washington. In Playing Changes, Chinen crystallizes the ideas he began to explore, piece by piece, as a critic, and expands them to provide the first exhaustive inquiry into the state of jazz in the music’s second century.

It’s a mark of his discipline and wisdom that Chinen constructs no grand thesis and offers no unifying theory of 21st-century jazz, beyond pointing out that “we have boundless permutations without fixed parameters.” He stays close to the ground, taking us along as he watches recording sessions, goes to shows, visits musicians and engages them in conversation, and listens. Above all, he listens. A skilled reporter and superb prose stylist, Chinen observes events keenly and writes vividly, but what makes his writing uncommonly penetrating is that he is a listener of true brilliance. His mind is as open as his ears.

In 12 pithy, breezy chapters, Chinen takes up as many themes and subjects, among them the tradition of innovation in jazz; its frequent collapse of long-standing categories and genres; the “uptown/downtown” scheme of aesthetic bifurcation that has reductively cast the jazz world into competing camps of avant-gardism and conservatism; the intermingling of musical styles from around the globe; jazz education and tutelage; and the influence of jazz’s elders on emerging talents. In a handful of chapters, Chinen takes up individual musicians like the pianist Brad Mehldau, the saxophonists Steve Coleman and Kamasi Washington, and the guitarist Mary Halvorson, and lingers on their music and personalities. There’s not a page without an insight, deftly put, or an exquisitely pointed and evocative description of music.

“The music’s foothold in popular culture bears a precise correlation to the reports of its health or decline,” Chinen asserts. “Whatever is actually happening with the state of the art, among the musicians who make up its constituency, exerts less influence there.”

Discussing the composer John Zorn, an exemplar of resolute adventurism for a new generation of experimenters in, around, and outside of jazz, Chinen writes: “The music for [his group] Masada involved lyrically terse, coiled-spring melodies—derived from modal Jewish scales (often the Phrygian dominant, also commonly found in thrash metal)—and a rhythmic motor that could seize up and overheat but also swing straight down the center or simmer into a groove.” Chinen hears everything in the music, understands the relationships between the elements, and knows how to explain it all.

I have been in the same jazz clubs and seen the same shows as Chinen dozens of times, but have only exchanged collegial pleasantries with him. Reading Playing Changes, I felt as if I were spending a luxurious weekend away in close quarters with a smart new friend who loves the music I love, perhaps even more than I do. Playing Changes is not consistently deep as criticism; it is too ardent a work of advocacy to cast much doubt or take up awkward or displeasing aspects of the work Chinen discusses. He examines the jazz of our time with an open mind and an attitude of boundless positivity. But my weekend away with him, by way of his astute and beautiful writing, was so great that I’m not ready to go back home.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x