Name-Dropping

Name-Dropping

 

Handle with care

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Cryptic clues are all about words, and to some extent people’s names are simply a subset of that category. But when a name appears in a clue, it brings along a whole range of references that can enliven—and sometimes complicate—the solving process.

As a general rule, we prefer to limit our use of names to those of real people, because the alternative can seem jury-rigged. The fact that PRESBYTERIANS is an anagram of BRITNEY SPEARS is a noteworthy and interesting discovery; that CONGREGATIONALISTS can be anagrammed to spell the hypothetical name GEORGINA S. TALCISTON is not.

One cliché of cryptic clueing is to append “Wilder,” as an anagram indicator, to a first name with the anagrammable letters. We can proudly say that the only “Wilder” in our files is this one:
   GENE  Wilder means of inheritance (4)

On the other hand, we have invented one or two spurious people over the years:
   GOTCHA  Margot Chapman embraces one kind of journalism (6)
   PARAGRAPH  Norm Silver destroyed harp, gets consecutive sentences (9)

Still, for the most part, our name-dropping has been restricted to the real world. Sometimes we use a name simply as the best example of a type of person:
   BANJOIST  Prohibit support for Pete Seeger, e.g. (8)
   DIARIST  Bridget Jones, for example, is supremely terrible when read aloud (7)

Sometimes we use a well-known last name to clue a first name:
   DUSTBIN  Hoffman hiding black trashcan (7)
   E-COMMERCE  Come apart over Cunningham’s on-line business (1-8)
   INCENTIVE  Van Gogh, a little late: “I have a carrot” (9)
   WATERGATE  With Garbo making a comeback, devoured scandal (9)

But the most satisfying type of clue involves using the full name, perhaps by way of revealing some latent quality of wordplay that the name exhibits. The most common example involves hidden words, which can often lurk astride the gap between a first and last name:
   ELMO  Michael Moore describes a red puppet (4)
   EVEN SO  While this may be true, it is assumed by Steven Soderbergh (4,2)
   LYRIC  Singable excerpt from Joely Richardson (5)
   RIFLE  Weapon concealed by Ari Fleischer (5)

Whenever possible, we like to include both first and last names, but use them in different ways. Ideally, one of the names can serve as a definition, while the other is part of the wordplay:
   OPEN  Frank O’Hara’s chief writing implement (4)
   RED-BAITER  Fire ant, perhaps, consuming the head of Andrew McCarthy, famously (3-6)

Or the two names may both be part of the wordplay, but in different ways:
   FORMATTED  Matt Drudge, finally taken in by president, laid out… (9)
   SPINAL  Originally, Sarah Palin edited a certain column (6)

A delightful subset of the latter category are names that can also serve as indicators for a particular type of wordplay, such as anagram…
   RETYPE  Peter Tosh welcomes Mary, at last, to enter again (6)
   KRYPTONITE  Harry Potter with inky substance that counteracts supernatural powers (10)

…or initial letter (this one we stole from the puzzler Brian Tivol):
   NOODLES  Tip O’Neill has plentiful quantities of pasta (7)

To date, our most concentrated name blowout remains this clue:
   FLAGELLATED  Jack Fitzgerald Kennedy is whipped (11)

With this post, we begin a regular weekly clueing challenge for our readers. Can you come up with a cryptic clue for DENOMINATION? Please share here, along with any quibbles, questions, kudos or complaints about the current puzzle or any previous puzzle. To comment (and see other readers’ comments), please click on this post’s title and scroll to the bottom of the resulting screen.

And here are four links:
• The current puzzle
• Our puzzle-solving guidelines | PDF
• Our e-books (solve past puzzles on your iOS device—many hints provided by the software!)
• A Nation puzzle solver’s blog where every one of our clues is explained in detail.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x