The Massachusetts Lesson: Go Populist Now

The Massachusetts Lesson: Go Populist Now

The Massachusetts Lesson: Go Populist Now

Election results rarely have a single explanation.

Yet it’s pretty clear that Scott Brown’s special election win in a state that last sent a Republican to the Senate in 1978 is an indicator of the turbulent national political mood a year after Obama took office.

There is a generalized anti-establishment anger loose in this country, reinforced by a White House team that has delivered for Wall Street but not enough for hurting communities. It is an anger also fueled by often savage, right-wing anti-government attacks.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Election results rarely have a single explanation.

Yet it’s pretty clear that Scott Brown’s special election win in a state that last sent a Republican to the Senate in 1978 is an indicator of the turbulent national political mood a year after Obama took office.

There is a generalized anti-establishment anger loose in this country, reinforced by a White House team that has delivered for Wall Street but not enough for hurting communities. It is an anger also fueled by often savage, right-wing anti-government attacks.

This special election is a wake up call and should lead to a course correction. The Democratic party can no longer run as a managerial and technocratic party. Going populist is now smart politics and good policy.

The Obama White House needs to show, quickly and forcefully, with concrete, bold and visible action, that it stands with the working people of America. Here’s a symbolic but smart start: jettison those on the White House economic team whose slow, timid response to the crisis of unemployment and to Wall Street’s obscene excesses helped create the conditions for the Tea Party’s inchoate right-wing populism.

Leadership on pro-democracy reforms are also desperately needed to end the corruption of our politics and to stanch the corporate money flooding and deforming of our democracy. Connect the dots for people: explain how needed reforms are gutted when both parties succumb to the pervasive corruption of our money politics. If the GOP’s obstructionism has a silver lining, it is in exposing how an anti-democratic, super-majority filibuster has essentially made our system dysfunctional. There is fertile ground on which to rally people in a transpartisan political reform movement.

Massachusetts offers another lesson: Obama’s decision to demobilize his base in 2009 in favor of an insider approach to governing was a big mistake. I’m not a political strategist, but I don’t know how you win elections by failing to rouse people who’ve worked hardest at the grassroots to get you elected? It is time to re-mobilize the base.

And here’s a no-brainer: Isn’t it time to give up on that faith in genteel post-partisanship when the GOP knifes you at every turn? Nice isn’t going create more jobs or get health care reform.

Before pivoting to a laser-like focus on jobs and the economy, passing the strongest possible healthcare bill as quickly as is feasible is a top priority.There are various procedural options being considered. (Passing the Senate bill followed by changes via budget reconciliation may be a smart and even realistic idea.) Passing a bill won’t be the Democrats’ political salvation–but if Obama and his party fail it would be the most catastrophic legislative failure since 1994 and possibly snuff out any chance for reform in other arenas moving forward.

President Obama warned us that change wouldn’t come easy. Many believe he hasn’t held up his end in fighting hard enough for key progressive priorities.

What comes next will test the President’s willingness to learn the lessons of this last year. Get tough, get bold, kiss “post-partisanship” goodbye and fight hard for jobs and a just economy of shared prosperity. And put yourself squarely back on the side of working people.

President Obama: Don’t pay attention to those who counsel going slow. The only thing you have to fear is caution itself.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x