Making One’s Mark

Making One’s Mark

Questionable clues?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

We usually eschew end-of-clue punctuation, even when we manage to have a clue that is a bona fide sentence, as in this example:
   EMIGRANTS  They have moved away from streaming illegally (9)

One exception is the exclamation point; as is standard in American cryptic usage, we generally use that to indicate an &lit clue. But the more common exception is the question mark. At the end of a clue, it can indicate quite a few different things. Sometimes it signals a jokey or punny definition (either the main one or the second part of a double-definition clue):
   ANDROCLES  Mythical bird, originally living in a mountain range with amateur

   veterinarian? (9)

   DEMOCRATIC PARTY  A pretty rad comic playing the blues? (10,5)
   GREAT DEPRESSION  Economic catastrophe in the Grand Canyon? (5,10)
   HARD TIMES  1854 novel in the print edition of a newspaper? (4,5)

Sometimes it indicates a heteronymic reading of the entry:
   ANTIQUITY  In olden times, a health club that won’t let you give up? (9)
   HATRACK  Something you might see in the front hall or hear on a sitcom? (7)

It might flag a reading that is far-fetched or unexpected:
   ASSESSES  Rates female donkeys? (8)
   COOPERATION  Teamwork in making barrels? (11)
   DEMEANING  Shameful process of making people nicer? (9)

…or even absurd or ridiculous:
   ACTIVIST  Militant whose favorite part of a Shakespeare play is the penultimate section? (8)
   BUCOLIC  Rural ailment afflicting infants at a New England school? (7)
   CORONATION  Installation of a sovereign in Chad or Oman? (10)
   FOREARMED  Prepared, like, half an octopus in the sound? (9)
   HAMBURGER  One who encourages second choice for pork as a fast-food standard? (9)

A question mark could reveal that we suspect someone out there will object to a clue they will deem, well, questionable:
   FREE THROW  Worth undertaking after a foul? (4,5)
   DETERGENT  Barman’s cleanser? (9)
   GOLDENEYE  Objective: refuse to be heard in a thriller about a duck? (9)

In short, all you can conclude from a question mark is that “something is going on here.” Or not! Sometimes a question mark is just a question mark:
   CROSSWORD  Sorcerer, half looking back at weapon: “You’re wasting your time with

   this?” (9)

This week’s cluing challenge: INTERROGATE. To comment (and see other readers’ comments), please click on this post’s title and scroll to the bottom of the resulting screen. And now, four links:
• The current puzzle
• Our puzzle-solving guidelines | PDF
• Our e-books (solve past puzzles on your iOS device—many hints provided by the software!)
• A Nation puzzle solver’s blog where every one of our clues is explained in detail. This is also where you can post quibbles, questions, kudos or complaints about the current puzzle, as well as ask for hints.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x