Lies about Ike: Stephen Ambrose, Another Historian in Trouble

Lies about Ike: Stephen Ambrose, Another Historian in Trouble

Lies about Ike: Stephen Ambrose, Another Historian in Trouble

Stephen Ambrose said he spent hundreds of hours interviewing Ike. The Eisenhower library says he didn’t.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Stephen Ambrose, the best-selling historian who wrote or edited more than a dozen books about Eisenhower as general and president, based his fame in large part on what he said were his interviews with Ike – but now, eight years after Ambrose’s death, an official at the Eisenhower Library in Abeline says the interviews never took place.

In his first and biggest Ike book, “The Supreme Commander,” published in 1970, Ambrose listed nine interviews with the former president. But according to Richard Rayner of The New Yorker, that’s not true. The deputy director of the Eisenhower Presidential Library and Museum in Abilene, Kansas, Tim Rives, told Rayer that Ike saw Ambrose only three times, for a total of less than five hours, and that the two men were never alone together.

Ambrose wrote more books about Ike after “The Supreme Commander,” including a two-volume biography. As the books got longer, the footnotes got fuzzier – instead of specific dates, readers found footnotes reading simply “Interview DE.” But “as the citations grew more nebulous,” Rayner writes, “the range of subjects that the interviews allegedly covered grew wider: the Rosenberg case, Dien Bien Phu, Douglas MacArthur, J.F.K., quitting smoking, the influence of Eisenhower’s mother, Brown v. Board of Education.”

It turns out Ambrose was making it up. You might call that "lying."

Ambrose often waxed eloquent about interviewing Ike — on C-SPAN, and “Charlie Rose,” Rayner reports, Ambrose described “how his life had been transformed by getting to know the former President and spending ‘hundreds and hundreds of hours’ interviewing him" during the five years before Eisenhower died in 1969.

In one C-SPAN interview, cited by Rayner, Ambrose went so far as to say he didn’t approach Ike; instead, he said, Ike approached him. After that, “I’d walk in to interview him,” Ambrose said, “and his eyes would lock on mine and I would be there for three hours and they never left my eyes.”

Rives told Rayner that’s not what happened. The records of Ike’s schedule are extremely detailed. Ike’s staff “demanded that anyone wanting an appointment with him needed to begin the process months ahead of time. His declining health also limited access, especially for scholars. He simply didn’t see that much of Stephen Ambrose.”

Ambrose, who sold over five million books during his lifetime, faced a barrage of plagiarism charges in 2002 when The Weekly Standard and Forbes showed that his bestseller "The Wild Blue" contained passages that had already appeared in eight books by other authors. Three other Ambrose books were also found to have contained plagiarized passages — for the Ambrose plagiarism story, see my book "Historians in Trouble."

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x