Letters From the November 11/18, 2019, Issue

Letters From the November 11/18, 2019, Issue

Letters From the November 11/18, 2019, Issue


A Matter of Degrees

I have been most interested in The Nation’s coverage of the climate crisis, particularly Daniel Judt’s “https://www.thenation.com/article/senegal-climate-injustice/” [October 7]. However, in many publications, including The Nation, the projected temperature increase is expressed in Celsius instead of Fahrenheit. I find that misleading to US readers, who may not be accustomed to the metric system and may find it harder to take climate change seriously when expressed in Celsius—“What’s a few degrees? Nothing serious.” But if The Nation and other publications would express temperature projections in Faarenheit, that might help highlight the crisis.
Maryanne Buchanan
akron, ohio

Devil in the Dixie

I want to thank Patricia J. Williams for unpacking the disturbing and painful prettification of Confederate slavery [“Plantation Blues,” October 14]. A few years ago, my family visited the upscale Hilton Head resorts in South Carolina for a music festival. Numerous gated communities (all-white, of course) have “plantation” in their names. Nobody but our family seemed embarrassed by this vicarious enjoyment of slave owners’ privileges.
Andrew Oram
arlington, mass.

Rush to Judgment

Many thanks for Eric Alterman’s column “Vicious Cycle” [October 14], in which he summarizes three books tackling the mystery of the Trump presidency. I must say that I am in most agreement with the talk radio theory put forward by Brian Rosenwald in Talk Radio’s America. I was married to a registered Republican for years. I can almost tell you to the day when he started listening to Rush Limbaugh. Every night, it was another outrageous tale of terror that started with “You’ll never guess what they are going to do now.” “They” were the liberals. My now former husband became suspicious, agitated, angry, and xenophobic. Talk radio let him off the hook. He was no longer complicit in the creation of his own unfulfilled life. “They” were.
Helen Temple
long beach, calif.

Tag-Teaming the Primary

That Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren stick together [“Bernie and Liz” by D.D. Guttenplan, October 14] is a tribute to their progressivism and their refusal to play politics as usual. Only one, however, can win the Democratic nomination for president, not both. Changes in the Democratic Party’s rules governing the nomination in 2020 give one of them the opportunity to win, but as the polls stand now, only with the cooperation of the other.

In every state and territory’s primary or caucus, the percentage of votes each candidate receives will determine, by proportionality, the percentages of delegates she or he receives on the first ballot at the Democratic National Convention next July. Moreover, only candidates receiving 15  percent or more votes in a state’s primary will be allocated delegates in that state. At present, only three candidates exceed 15 percent in the polls: Biden, Warren, and Sanders. If none of them receives a majority on the first ballot, then the nominee will be decided on the second or a subsequent ballot in which superdelegates (approximately 15 percent of all delegates), will decide the winner. Superdelegates consist mostly of Democratic National Committee members, Democratic U.S. Senators and Representatives, and Governors. Biden has been endorsed by many more potential superdelegates than either Warren or Sanders.

In terms of Democratic primary polling, Biden and Warren are running quite close; neither has a majority in most states. The sum of their votes, however, could constitute a majority. If the situation stays the same through the early primaries, Warren and Sanders could ensure that one of them will win the nomination: They could jointly issue a statement acknowledging that neither is likely to have a majority of delegates when the primaries and caucuses are over; consequently, the one with fewer delegates would withdraw in favor of the other. The withdrawal could be delayed until May or June, permitting both to continue campaigning and emphasizing progressive policies.

Let’s hope they continue to work together in that way and their supporters show the same generosity.

Neil A. (Tony) Holtzman
menlo park, calif.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy