Leading ‘Clean CR’ House Republican Explains His Limitations: Party Loyalty

Leading ‘Clean CR’ House Republican Explains His Limitations: Party Loyalty

Leading ‘Clean CR’ House Republican Explains His Limitations: Party Loyalty

Congressman Peter King has talked tough about re-opening the government, but hasn’t been able to deliver.


Lee Fang interviews Rep. Peter King (R-NY).

The quagmire in Washington, DC, seems to be the result of party loyalty.

Enough Republican lawmakers have signaled publicly that they would support a continuing resolution (CR) without any policy riders attached (like Obamacare defunding), a legislative package that would ultimately end the government shutdown. They’ve received a lot of attention, yet nothing has happened.

In fact, the government could be on its way to opening back up if the faction of Republican politicians in the House who say they would pass a so-called “clean CR” sign onto a legislative maneuver offered by Democrats called a discharge petition. As The Washington Post reported, 195 Democrats have signaled support for the petition—which, added with the House Republicans who have indicated that they would pass a clean CR, would be enough to move the proposal forward.

We talked to several members of the GOP “clean caucus,” but found answers to be elusive. Representative Frank Wolf, asked about his prior position on supporting a clean continuing resolution, growled, “When I say something, it’s what I mean.” As we asked if he would sign the discharge petition that would force a vote on a clean CR, the Virginia Republican turned and walked away.

Representative Peter King, Republican of Long Island, is perhaps the most visible opponent of the shutdown. He has railed regularly in the media against followers of Senator Ted Cruz, calling him a “con man” and the entire strategy Cruz is leading “doomed to failure.”

As Slate’s Dave Weigel pointed out, King floated the idea that as many as twenty-five moderate Republican lawmakers would join him in a vote against a rule that allowed the Obamacare-defunding CR, the budget bill that sparked the shutdown. But when the vote came up, King delivered only a single moderate vote, other than himself.

Although King knocked the idea of signing the clean CR discharge petition on Fox News Sunday, telling host Chris Wallace that “it’s not going anywhere,” we asked the congressman to further explain his unwillingness to embrace the plan.



While King brushed aside criticism, every other lawmaker of the clean caucus we spoke to refused to comment on the discharge petition.

King stressed that he knows how to “get things done” and said he was working on a plan to end the crisis.

“I’m only one guy, I only have so much power,” said Representative King, one more time explaining why the discharge petition would be too dangerous for him politically. “I’d lose a lot of credibility.”

In a certain twist of irony, the discharge petition supported by Democrats forces a vote on a bill originally sponsored by Congressman James Lankford, a Tea Party–backed lawmaker who fully supports taking both the debt ceiling and government funding bills hostage in exchange for a slew of drastic policy demands. If the petition gains enough signatures, Lankford’s bill, which maintains government funding but includes automatic government spending cuts, would be swapped out for a clean CR.

We caught up with Lankford at the Weyrich Lunch on Wednesday—a meeting ground, as reported by TheNation.com this week, where many of the conservative advocacy groups behind the shutdown effort conduct strategy sessions. Lankford, who mentioned he visits the group “about every couple of months or so,” said he would not be signing the discharge petition. “I would love to see some Democrats co-sponsoring my bill,” he said with a grin.

George Zornick says we’ve begun talking about Afghanistan again, but for the wrong reasons.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy