John Boehner’s House Republicans Finally Find Something They’re For: Salmonella

John Boehner’s House Republicans Finally Find Something They’re For: Salmonella

John Boehner’s House Republicans Finally Find Something They’re For: Salmonella

You would think everyone in Congress could agree to be against food poisoning. You would be wrong. The overwhelming majority of House Republicans voted against cracking down on food-borne illness.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The US Senate voted unanimously for the Food Safety Modernization Act, a sweeping measure that gives the federal government broad new powers to inspect processing plants, order recalls of contaminated products and apply US standards to imported foods.

No surprise there.

After recent contamination scares involving peanuts, eggs and produce, Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, should be able to be able to put aside differences and  agree that its important to assure that what we eat does not make us sick.

You would think that protecting kids from food-borne illness would be something everyone in Congress could agree upon. 

You would, unfortunately, be wrong.

When the measure got to the House, the overwhelming majority of Republicans voted against food safety.

Apparently, House Republicans are so committed to freedom that they are determined to defend the right of salmonella and listeria to roam at the dinner table.

As a result the food-safety bill was approved in the House by a mere 215-144 majority—more than enough to send this vital bill to the president’s desk—but hardly a ringing endorsement. 

The “yes” votes came from 205 Democrats and 10 Republicans.

 The “no” votes were those of 136 Republicans and 8 Democrats (most of them farm-state Blue Dogs).

Among the Republican “no” voters were incoming Speaker John Boehner, incoming Majority Leader Eric Cantor and incoming Agriculture Committee chairman Frank Lucas.

The Food Safety Modernization Act will become law. And it will do a lot of good by:

1. Allowing the FDA to order a recall of tainted foods. Currently the agency can only negotiate with businesses to order voluntary recalls. 

2. Requiring the FDA to create new produce safety regulations for producers of the highest risk fruits and vegetables.

3. Increasing inspections of domestic and foreign food facilities, directing the most resources to those operations with the highest risk profiles. The riskiest domestic facilities would be inspected every three years.

4. Requiring farms and processors to keep records to help the government trace recalled foods.

5. Requiring grocery stores to proactively alert consumers about recalls.

"This is a big victory for consumers that finally brings food-safety laws into the 21st century," says Jean Halloran, the director of food policy initiatives at Consumers Union. "This win is a powerful testament to the people across the country who came to Washington to tell their lawmakers how contaminated food had killed their loved ones or left them horribly sick. This win is for them and all Americans. For a long time, we’ve been saying that we needed to do a better job of making sure our food is safe, and under this bill, we will."

Good news for consumers is bad news for salmonella, however.

No matter how you spin it, food-borne illness lost a round with the passage of the Food Safety Modernization Act.

But don’t think that stomach sickness will disappear altogether. Food poisoning will be well represented when Boehner and his fellow Republicans take charge of the House in January.

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x