John Boehner’s House Republicans Finally Find Something They’re For: Salmonella

John Boehner’s House Republicans Finally Find Something They’re For: Salmonella

John Boehner’s House Republicans Finally Find Something They’re For: Salmonella

You would think everyone in Congress could agree to be against food poisoning. You would be wrong. The overwhelming majority of House Republicans voted against cracking down on food-borne illness.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The US Senate voted unanimously for the Food Safety Modernization Act, a sweeping measure that gives the federal government broad new powers to inspect processing plants, order recalls of contaminated products and apply US standards to imported foods.

No surprise there.

After recent contamination scares involving peanuts, eggs and produce, Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, should be able to be able to put aside differences and  agree that its important to assure that what we eat does not make us sick.

You would think that protecting kids from food-borne illness would be something everyone in Congress could agree upon. 

You would, unfortunately, be wrong.

When the measure got to the House, the overwhelming majority of Republicans voted against food safety.

Apparently, House Republicans are so committed to freedom that they are determined to defend the right of salmonella and listeria to roam at the dinner table.

As a result the food-safety bill was approved in the House by a mere 215-144 majority—more than enough to send this vital bill to the president’s desk—but hardly a ringing endorsement. 

The “yes” votes came from 205 Democrats and 10 Republicans.

 The “no” votes were those of 136 Republicans and 8 Democrats (most of them farm-state Blue Dogs).

Among the Republican “no” voters were incoming Speaker John Boehner, incoming Majority Leader Eric Cantor and incoming Agriculture Committee chairman Frank Lucas.

The Food Safety Modernization Act will become law. And it will do a lot of good by:

1. Allowing the FDA to order a recall of tainted foods. Currently the agency can only negotiate with businesses to order voluntary recalls. 

2. Requiring the FDA to create new produce safety regulations for producers of the highest risk fruits and vegetables.

3. Increasing inspections of domestic and foreign food facilities, directing the most resources to those operations with the highest risk profiles. The riskiest domestic facilities would be inspected every three years.

4. Requiring farms and processors to keep records to help the government trace recalled foods.

5. Requiring grocery stores to proactively alert consumers about recalls.

"This is a big victory for consumers that finally brings food-safety laws into the 21st century," says Jean Halloran, the director of food policy initiatives at Consumers Union. "This win is a powerful testament to the people across the country who came to Washington to tell their lawmakers how contaminated food had killed their loved ones or left them horribly sick. This win is for them and all Americans. For a long time, we’ve been saying that we needed to do a better job of making sure our food is safe, and under this bill, we will."

Good news for consumers is bad news for salmonella, however.

No matter how you spin it, food-borne illness lost a round with the passage of the Food Safety Modernization Act.

But don’t think that stomach sickness will disappear altogether. Food poisoning will be well represented when Boehner and his fellow Republicans take charge of the House in January.

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x