John Boehner’s House Republicans Finally Find Something They’re For: Salmonella

John Boehner’s House Republicans Finally Find Something They’re For: Salmonella

John Boehner’s House Republicans Finally Find Something They’re For: Salmonella

You would think everyone in Congress could agree to be against food poisoning. You would be wrong. The overwhelming majority of House Republicans voted against cracking down on food-borne illness.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

The US Senate voted unanimously for the Food Safety Modernization Act, a sweeping measure that gives the federal government broad new powers to inspect processing plants, order recalls of contaminated products and apply US standards to imported foods.

No surprise there.

After recent contamination scares involving peanuts, eggs and produce, Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, should be able to be able to put aside differences and  agree that its important to assure that what we eat does not make us sick.

You would think that protecting kids from food-borne illness would be something everyone in Congress could agree upon. 

You would, unfortunately, be wrong.

When the measure got to the House, the overwhelming majority of Republicans voted against food safety.

Apparently, House Republicans are so committed to freedom that they are determined to defend the right of salmonella and listeria to roam at the dinner table.

As a result the food-safety bill was approved in the House by a mere 215-144 majority—more than enough to send this vital bill to the president’s desk—but hardly a ringing endorsement. 

The “yes” votes came from 205 Democrats and 10 Republicans.

 The “no” votes were those of 136 Republicans and 8 Democrats (most of them farm-state Blue Dogs).

Among the Republican “no” voters were incoming Speaker John Boehner, incoming Majority Leader Eric Cantor and incoming Agriculture Committee chairman Frank Lucas.

The Food Safety Modernization Act will become law. And it will do a lot of good by:

1. Allowing the FDA to order a recall of tainted foods. Currently the agency can only negotiate with businesses to order voluntary recalls. 

2. Requiring the FDA to create new produce safety regulations for producers of the highest risk fruits and vegetables.

3. Increasing inspections of domestic and foreign food facilities, directing the most resources to those operations with the highest risk profiles. The riskiest domestic facilities would be inspected every three years.

4. Requiring farms and processors to keep records to help the government trace recalled foods.

5. Requiring grocery stores to proactively alert consumers about recalls.

"This is a big victory for consumers that finally brings food-safety laws into the 21st century," says Jean Halloran, the director of food policy initiatives at Consumers Union. "This win is a powerful testament to the people across the country who came to Washington to tell their lawmakers how contaminated food had killed their loved ones or left them horribly sick. This win is for them and all Americans. For a long time, we’ve been saying that we needed to do a better job of making sure our food is safe, and under this bill, we will."

Good news for consumers is bad news for salmonella, however.

No matter how you spin it, food-borne illness lost a round with the passage of the Food Safety Modernization Act.

But don’t think that stomach sickness will disappear altogether. Food poisoning will be well represented when Boehner and his fellow Republicans take charge of the House in January.

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

Become a Sustaining Donor This September

Between the reemergence of right-wing red-baiting and Donald Trump’s use of the chilling National Security Presidential Memorandum–7 to criminalize left political organizing, we’re seeing McCarthyism reborn before our eyes.

This assault on democracy cannot be ignored or wished away. Resisting it requires bravery in the face of threats and repression, a steadfast commitment to the truth, and the unwavering belief that we can—and will—overcome this darkness.

We must have an independent media that sets the record straight, unearths corruption and abuses of power, and advances a politics of justice and dignity for all if we’re to win this fight.

That’s why I’m writing to you today. This September, The Nation needs to add 100 monthly donors to sustain our progressive journalism. Your contribution makes the next investigative report, the next truth-speaking column, and the next pathbreaking essay all possible. 

I hope you’ll support our work with a recurring donation today. If you donate $10 or more a month, we’ll send you a brand new “Hands Off the Free Press!” sticker to recognise your commitment to our cause. Please, donate today. 

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x