January 13, 1941: James Joyce Dies

January 13, 1941: James Joyce Dies

A 1917 Nation reviewer takes issue with Joyce’s “brilliant and nasty variety of pseudo-realism.”

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

James Joyce died on this day in 1941. The Nation had been following his career nearly from the first. This May 17, 1917, review of A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man was written by H.W. Boynton, a longtime critic for The Nation who ultimately contributed well over 100 essays. It bears all the marks of the pre-1918 Nation, not yet converted to the cause of political and cultural radicalism.

The brilliant and nasty variety of pseudo-realism is excellently exemplified in “A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.” Very plainly the author has set out with the intention of putting another nail in the coffin of convention—which to his mind is much the same thing as decency. What is reticence but hypocrisy? How are we to be honest with each other if we do not use the words that are written upon the fair lexicon of blank wall and private place? How are we to see life whole if we hesitate to chronicle the thoughts and experiences which those words connote for fumbling youth? This young Irish writer is determined to have it out…. His conscious determination is the usual sign of limit and defect. It is so hard to keep one’s balance. In the act of squaring off to hit insincerity in the eye, somehow writers of talent are always forgetting what writers of supreme genius never have to remember—that one does not interpret truth by swatting at any half-truth—or by magnifying any fact. Mr. James Joyce is by no means a trifler, but it would be the best thing in the world for him if he could forget that he is a rebel.

January 13, 1941

To mark The Nation’s 150th anniversary, every morning this year The Almanac will highlight something that happened that day in history—an event, a birth, a death—and how The Nation covered it. Get The Almanac every day (or every week) by signing up to the e-mail newsletter.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x