It’s Not Torture – Mao Agrees

It’s Not Torture – Mao Agrees

As noted in my last post, some conservatives have perused the contents of the newly released torture memos and concluded that they do not, in fact, authorize torture. Today’s New York Times informs us that these conservatives are not alone. As Scott Shane and Mark Mazzetti report in this excellent article, the SERE tactics authorized under Bush were created to give US soldiers and pilots a sample of the torture methods used by Communists during the Korean War. "The Communists do not look upon these assaults as ‘torture,’" a 1956 government study of shackling, sleep deprivation and other techniques used by Chinese Communists noted. The logic didn’t quite persuade the authors of the study:

 

But all of them produce great discomfort, and lead to serious disturbances of many bodily processes; there is no reason to differentiate them from any other form of torture.

 

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

As noted in my last post, some conservatives have perused the contents of the newly released torture memos and concluded that they do not, in fact, authorize torture. Today’s New York Times informs us that these conservatives are not alone. As Scott Shane and Mark Mazzetti report in this excellent article, the SERE tactics authorized under Bush were created to give US soldiers and pilots a sample of the torture methods used by Communists during the Korean War. "The Communists do not look upon these assaults as ‘torture,’" a 1956 government study of shackling, sleep deprivation and other techniques used by Chinese Communists noted. The logic didn’t quite persuade the authors of the study:

 

But all of them produce great discomfort, and lead to serious disturbances of many bodily processes; there is no reason to differentiate them from any other form of torture.

 

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x