It’s My Party and I’ll Whine if I Want To

It’s My Party and I’ll Whine if I Want To

It’s My Party and I’ll Whine if I Want To

The Frank budget has not been embraced by the Democratic leadership–and is unlikely to be so welcomed. The Democratic Party still hasn’t caught on; it remains a body at war with itself.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

This is an excerpt from a column that originally appeared in the issue of December 25, 1989.

The Frank budget has not been embraced by the Democratic leadership–and is unlikely to be so welcomed. The Democratic Party still hasn’t caught on; it remains a body at war with itself. Last month Senator Charles Robb, a leader of the Democratic Leadership Council, issued a broadside against those whom he may as well have called out-of-the- closet liberals. Speaking in readily decipherable code, he decried his party for “expanding government for the benefit of special interests” instead of “expanding opportunities for ordinary Americans.” By “special interests” he did not mean the robber barons of the savings and loan industry. When I asked his press secretary if Robb could explain the difference between “ordinary Americans” and “special interests,” she paused and then promised to get back to me. The promise wasn’t kept, but then it didn’t need to be.

Robb’s speech was vapid. “We can become the architects of a fundamental redirection of our national priorities,” he huffed. But he’s an architect without a blueprint. He bemoaned Congress’s preoccupation with such symbolic is-sues as arts funding and flag burning, but could do no more than urge his party to “build a new agenda on mainstream values.” Change D.L.C. to D.P.L., for Democratic Party Lite: great tasting themes and no filling details. Alas, for Robb, with the changes in the East, the D.P.L. crowd has lost half its brief against those liberals who once were derisively termed McGovernite. (Remember Les Aspin’s snotty remark in July when the House approved a scaled-back Pentagon budget: “We’ve got a Michael Dukakis budget.”) The best Robb can do now is show that he is not as crass as Lee Atwater in playing the race card. While attacking “speciid interests,” he neverthelessclaims his is the party to give hope to the impoverished, deal with the housing crisis, expand health and child care. But, unlike Frank and the black caucus, the architect has nothing concrete to offer.

Become a Sustaining Donor This September

Between the reemergence of right-wing red-baiting and Donald Trump’s use of the chilling National Security Presidential Memorandum–7 to criminalize left political organizing, we’re seeing McCarthyism reborn before our eyes.

This assault on democracy cannot be ignored or wished away. Resisting it requires bravery in the face of threats and repression, a steadfast commitment to the truth, and the unwavering belief that we can—and will—overcome this darkness.

We must have an independent media that sets the record straight, unearths corruption and abuses of power, and advances a politics of justice and dignity for all if we’re to win this fight.

That’s why I’m writing to you today. This September, The Nation needs to add 100 monthly donors to sustain our progressive journalism. Your contribution makes the next investigative report, the next truth-speaking column, and the next pathbreaking essay all possible. 

I hope you’ll support our work with a recurring donation today. If you donate $10 or more a month, we’ll send you a brand new “Hands Off the Free Press!” sticker to recognise your commitment to our cause. Please, donate today. 

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x