It’s My Party and I’ll Whine if I Want To

It’s My Party and I’ll Whine if I Want To

It’s My Party and I’ll Whine if I Want To

The Frank budget has not been embraced by the Democratic leadership–and is unlikely to be so welcomed. The Democratic Party still hasn’t caught on; it remains a body at war with itself.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

This is an excerpt from a column that originally appeared in the issue of December 25, 1989.

The Frank budget has not been embraced by the Democratic leadership–and is unlikely to be so welcomed. The Democratic Party still hasn’t caught on; it remains a body at war with itself. Last month Senator Charles Robb, a leader of the Democratic Leadership Council, issued a broadside against those whom he may as well have called out-of-the- closet liberals. Speaking in readily decipherable code, he decried his party for “expanding government for the benefit of special interests” instead of “expanding opportunities for ordinary Americans.” By “special interests” he did not mean the robber barons of the savings and loan industry. When I asked his press secretary if Robb could explain the difference between “ordinary Americans” and “special interests,” she paused and then promised to get back to me. The promise wasn’t kept, but then it didn’t need to be.

Robb’s speech was vapid. “We can become the architects of a fundamental redirection of our national priorities,” he huffed. But he’s an architect without a blueprint. He bemoaned Congress’s preoccupation with such symbolic is-sues as arts funding and flag burning, but could do no more than urge his party to “build a new agenda on mainstream values.” Change D.L.C. to D.P.L., for Democratic Party Lite: great tasting themes and no filling details. Alas, for Robb, with the changes in the East, the D.P.L. crowd has lost half its brief against those liberals who once were derisively termed McGovernite. (Remember Les Aspin’s snotty remark in July when the House approved a scaled-back Pentagon budget: “We’ve got a Michael Dukakis budget.”) The best Robb can do now is show that he is not as crass as Lee Atwater in playing the race card. While attacking “speciid interests,” he neverthelessclaims his is the party to give hope to the impoverished, deal with the housing crisis, expand health and child care. But, unlike Frank and the black caucus, the architect has nothing concrete to offer.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x