If Justice Scalia Really Had His Way…

If Justice Scalia Really Had His Way…

If Justice Scalia Really Had His Way…

His desire was for an America as it was before Gone With the Wind.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

We are told not to speak badly of the dead, but the torrent of praise for Justice Scalia requires us to be more discerning. We are told we should admire Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s graciousness as shown in the kind words she gave us about Justice Scalia’s contributions and his death.

I do not have any numbers that can show how many lives Justice Scalia’s decisions tormented or broke. I do not know how many prisoners were put in jail and tortured because of his views of the cruel and unusual clause of the Eight Amendment of the Constitution. I do not know how many deserving children were kept out of schools or how many men and women were kept out of jobs or how many hundreds of thousands of people throughout this nation were denied the right to vote because of his often passionate views.

Fortunately, the law constrained him from doing his worst.

If he had his way, Brown v. Board of Education, striking down segregation in the public schools because of the 14th Amendment, might have been otherwise decided. He also believed that our landmark First Amendment decision, Times v. Sullivan, a 9-0 opinion that protected journalists by putting limits on libel suits, may have been wrongfully decided.

Justice Scalia justified his search for near certain truth saying “I am a textualist. I am an originalist. I am not a nut.” Like the Bible scholar who believes the world was created on the first day, Justice Scalia, a member of Opus Dei, believed that he was required to decide by looking for the original meanings in the statutes and our constitution. Chief Justice John Roberts put it a little differently: “My job is to call balls and strikes and not to pitch or bat…. Judges are umpires. Umpires don’t make rules; they apply them.”

In deciding we are bound by a dead constitution, rather than one that lives and breathes over time, Justice Scalia was adopting, as much as he could, the politics and values of times long since gone.

Scalia was not a nut any more than the Bible scholar who believes every word of the Bible. But Scalia had his own political agenda. His desire was for an America that very much existed before Gone With the Wind.

I do not know the future. I do not fully comprehend the past or the present. But I believe, hope and pray, that Justice Scalia’s absence from the Court will make the lives of Americans much better.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x