How to Protect the Vote

How to Protect the Vote

Democrats face significant obstacles in the fight to strengthen voting rights.


As the fiftieth anniversary of the Voting Rights Act approaches, the right to vote is under siege. From 2011 to 2012, 180 new voting restrictions were introduced in forty-one states, with nineteen states rolling back voting rights in some way. Then, in the 2013 Shelby County v. Holder case, the Supreme Court struck down Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), freeing those states with the worst histories of voting discrimination from having to approve their voting changes with the federal government. The result has been the greatest effort to restrict access to the ballot since the end of Reconstruction. The federal government and civil-rights groups have been struggling to respond ever since.

In the wake of Shelby County, the Justice Department and groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund have sued to block discriminatory voting changes in various states, including North Carolina, Ohio, Texas and Wisconsin, under the remaining provisions of the VRA. That strategy hasn’t been very successful so far: weeks before the 2014 election, the Supreme Court declined to block new restrictions in three of those four states. There are new trials pending in North Carolina and Texas, and the ACLU has asked the Supreme Court to review an appeals-court ruling upholding Wisconsin’s voter-ID law. It’s possible the Court will further gut the VRA if it hears one of these cases. (Voting-rights lawyers have had more success striking down new restrictions under state constitutions in places like Pennsylvania and Arkansas.)

The prospects for a legislative response to the Shelby County decision are slim. Last year, a bipartisan coalition led by House Republican Jim Sensenbrenner and Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy proposed the Voting Rights Amendment Act, which would partially restore the centerpiece of the VRA by requiring states with five voting-rights violations in the past fifteen years to clear their voting changes with the federal government. The law would immediately apply to Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, but it would not cover Alabama, where voting-rights marches led to the birth of the VRA, or serial offenders like Florida. And despite the VRA’s overwhelming reauthorization in 2006—by a vote of 390-33 in the House and 98-0 in the Senate—few Republicans have stepped forward to sponsor the new bill.

In the absence of new legislation strengthening the VRA, federal election reform has emerged as a top priority for voting-rights groups. The biggest problem in recent presidential elections has been the long lines at the polls in swing states like Ohio and Florida. “We have to fix that,” President Obama said on election night 2012. So he formed a bipartisan election commission, which made recommendations on how to reduce the long lines, ranging from expanding early-voting opportunities to adding more election-site workers and polling machines. The Brennan Center for Justice has also proposed modernizing the country’s antiquated voter-registration system so that eligible voters would be automatically registered at government agencies. This reform would add 50 million Americans to the rolls.

Congressional Democrats have introduced legislation to reduce the long lines and modernize voter registration, but any type of election reform has been a nonstarter with Republicans. “I don’t think it’s the federal government’s role to make sure there are no long lines,” said Michigan Republican Candice Miller, chair of the Committee on House Administration.

With federal legislation unlikely, the best prospects for election reform are in the states, primarily blue states controlled by Democrats. According to the Brennan Center, twelve states quietly passed measures expanding voter access in 2014—including Illinois, which adopted election-day voter registration and expanded early voting.

One reason it’s so easy to restrict voting rights is that, although there are constitutional amendments protecting the right to vote free of racial discrimination (Fifteenth), granting women suffrage (Nineteenth), banning the poll tax (Twenty-fourth) and raising the voting age to 18 (Twenty-sixth), there is no provision guaranteeing the basic right to cast a ballot. House Democrats Mark Pocan and Keith Ellison have proposed changing that with a simple amendment stating: “Every citizen of the United States, who is of legal voting age, shall have the fundamental right to vote in any public election held in the jurisdiction in which the citizen resides.”

But adding a right-to-vote amendment has long been a utopian dream. Any new amendment requires the ratification of two-thirds of Congress and three-quarters of the states—a virtual impossibility in the current political climate.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy