Hillary’s E-mail

Hillary’s E-mail

In the March 27 issue of The Nation, Ari Berman writes of top Democratic consultants’ strategy to either completely avoid discussing Iraq or support the war while criticizing George Bush’s handling of it.

As if to prove Berman’s point, two days ago Hillary Clinton sent a fundraising email on behalf of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) under the bold subject heading, "Changing the Senate."

Clinton opens with the pronouncement, "You and I both know America needs a change of direction–and the American people know it too."

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

In the March 27 issue of The Nation, Ari Berman writes of top Democratic consultants’ strategy to either completely avoid discussing Iraq or support the war while criticizing George Bush’s handling of it.

As if to prove Berman’s point, two days ago Hillary Clinton sent a fundraising email on behalf of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) under the bold subject heading, "Changing the Senate."

Clinton opens with the pronouncement, "You and I both know America needs a change of direction–and the American people know it too."

Yes, it’s true that the American people know it. And, as Berman points out, "Asked what should be the highest priority for America this year, the largest number of respondents in the latest NBC/Wall Street Journal poll chose bringing most of the troops home."

But in her 672 word email (hint to Dems: your emails are too long) calling for "change," how many times did Senator Clinton mention Iraq? You guessed it–not a mention.

Healthcare costs, education, energy, and New Orleans–-all critical issues–are each mentioned in the NY Senator’s appeal, along with this assertion: "I know that Democrats like you are ready to stand up and take on these tough challenges."

Hillary’s right on this. But Democrats and independents are also taking a stand on changing course in Iraq while leading Democrats run for cover. Where is their passion and attention on an issue that is paramount in voters’ concerns?

Three years, 20,000 U.S. casualties, up to $300 billion in direct war expenditures and close to $1 trillion in estimated total costs–and still no position? If not now, when?

Here’s an idea: contact Hillary, the DSCC, and the DCCC–tell them until they take a stand for you, you won’t take a stand for them either. The bank is closed. Because while they might not listen to the people, we know that money still talks in Washington.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It takes a dedicated team to publish timely, deeply researched pieces like this one. For over 150 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and democracy. Today, in a time of media austerity, articles like the one you just read are vital ways to speak truth to power and cover issues that are often overlooked by the mainstream media.

This month, we are calling on those who value us to support our Spring Fundraising Campaign and make the work we do possible. The Nation is not beholden to advertisers or corporate owners—we answer only to you, our readers.

Can you help us reach our $20,000 goal this month? Donate today to ensure we can continue to publish journalism on the most important issues of the day, from climate change and abortion access to the Supreme Court and the peace movement. The Nation can help you make sense of this moment, and much more.

Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Ad Policy
x