Georgia Voters Lose Out on a Secretary of State Who Would Have Protected Their Voting Rights

Georgia Voters Lose Out on a Secretary of State Who Would Have Protected Their Voting Rights

Georgia Voters Lose Out on a Secretary of State Who Would Have Protected Their Voting Rights

Stacey Abrams put time and money behind the runoff election for Georgia secretary of state, but in the wake of her loss, a lot of other resources disappeared.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

In the end, a race that might have slightly helped ease the pain of the narrow loss of Stacey Abrams in her race for Georgia governor last month fell short, when Democrat John Barrow lost his bid to become the next secretary of state, 52-48, in a runoff Tuesday night. Barrow sought to succeed Republican Brian Kemp, who defeated Abrams last month, and to undo the systems of voter suppression that allowed Kemp to choose the voters who made him governor, rather than the other way around.

Although Abrams tried to elevate Barrow’s race as part of her effort to use her loss to focus attention on Georgia’s unfair voting procedures, Barrow lacked the organization he needed to amplify her message—and maybe didn’t even have the message he needed. The white, former Blue Dog congressman from eastern Georgia voted against the Affordable Care Act and did not oppose the state’s voter-ID law, as Abrams did. He seemed to count on his status as Georgia’s last white Democrat in Congress to pull over white voters, joking in one ad, “Yeah, I’m a Democrat—but I won’t bite ya!” He did not evangelize against Kemp’s voter-suppression policies as vociferously Abrams did. But he was committed to reforming Georgia’s much-criticized and insecure electronic-voting apparatus and moving to a paper system, and undoing many of Kemp’s voter-discouraging policies. Republican Brad Raffensperger promised to continue Kemp’s legacy. President Donald Trump endorsed Raffensperger, tweeting that he would be “tough on Crime and Borders,” though the secretary of state plays no role on either issue.

Where Abrams got almost 2 million votes in her narrow November loss, Barrow got just under 700,000 Tuesday night, a little over one-third of her total. If just 40 percent of Abrams’s voters had turned out, the Democrat would have been the next secretary of state. Last month Barrow trailed the Republican by 19,000 votes; last night he trailed him by 60,000, with some absentee ballots still yet to count.

Barrow’s lackluster performance may reflect his own shortcomings as a candidate, but more important, in the wake of a top-draw national campaign like Abrams’s, it showed that Democrats are still not putting sufficient resources into recapturing offices like secretary of state, even though that role has enormous influence over voting rules and regulations. With the help of Georgia’s GOP-controlled state legislature, Kemp purged more than a million voters from the rolls for the crime of not voting regularly—something Barrow had promised to reverse—and advised counties on how to close polling places, leading to the loss of more than 200 in the last four years. He used an “exact match” system to guide voter registration, thwarting more than 50,000 Georgians this year alone just because the name on their identification wasn’t an exact match with the name on voter rolls—it might be missing a middle initial, for instance, or the hyphen in a last name.

Abrams put time and money behind the Barrow runoff, but in the wake of her loss, a lot of other resources disappeared. The New Georgia Project, founded by Abrams in 2013 to register and educate low income and rural voters of color, didn’t have the funding to keep many of its Georgia canvassers through the runoff, its leaders told The Washington Post this week. Besides, many voters were demoralized by Abrams’s close defeat. “Stacey’s loss was a really big loss for our community, not just that she lost but how she lost,” Black Voters Matter co-founder LaTosha Brown told Mother Jones. “I don’t know a single black person in Georgia that doesn’t believe that race was stolen. That’s a lot of wind out of the air.”

Although Democrats won secretary-of-state races in Arizona, Colorado, and Michigan this year, they lost some promising pickup opportunities in Iowa, Nevada, Kansas, Ohio—and now Georgia. Democrats were slow to match the energy Republicans put into flipping state legislatures over the last 10 years, and even as they make gains, the GOP tries to thwart them. As I write, Wisconsin Republicans are trying to limit the power of new Democratic Governor Tony Evers and Attorney General Josh Kaul, and also reduce voting rights, in a lame-duck session. Georgia voters had a chance to begin to level the playing field for state offices—but Democrats didn’t grab it.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x