General Douglas MacArthur

General Douglas MacArthur

Roger Baldwin, who spent three months working under MacArthur in Japan after World War II, remembers the general fondly.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Roger Baldwin, who spent three months working under MacArthur in Japan after World War II, remembers the general fondly.

Since I knew General MacArthur for only a brief three months while he was Supreme Commander in Japan, it may seem presumptuous of me to comment on him I do so only because I bear witness to a side of the General that is little appreciated, it was opened to me in an unexpectedly understanding relationship.

On his invitation, I had come to Japan as a private citizen to assist the Japanese in protecting their new civil liberties. Challenged to transform a feudal, militaristic nation into a peaceful democracy, General MacArthur had embarked on what he called a crusade. I found at once in him qualities that a great military career had concealed– a profound commitment to democratic liberties, an instinct for the equality of peoples, a respect for the sensitivities of the defeated Japanese and a reformer’s zeal.

Relations with the Japanese were so skillfully handled that they led into a veritable revolution. Popular forces were released for complete political freedom, for a democratic economic order with full tradeunion liberties and a vast distribution of land to farmers, and for the emancipation of women. These among many other reforms shook up Japanese institutions from the Emperor to the police.

I witnessed the first test of the new order, under the new constitution renouncing militarism and establishing democracy, when the first election brought to office a Christian Socialist Prime Minister. This election won the General’s warn approval, and the spirit that welcomed the results of a free election accepted the principles of civil liberties without question. Not once did I have reason to differ with the General. It is largely to his credit that Japan today the most effective system for protecting, citizens’ rights of any nation outside the West.

General MacArthur took profound pride in the renunciation of war in the new Japanese constitution, remarking to me that it was a shining example which all nations eventually must follow. Staunchly internationalist, he favored a peace treaty long before it came, with a Japan ready, he said, to join the United Nations. “The Japanese,” he added, “have already joined it in their hearts.”

On the personal side of General MacArthur, as revealed in my conferences, I found nothing to bear out the often-cited impression of vain egotism. He was ever responsive and considerate, as eager to listen as to talk. I heard from many that his appearance of vanity in public was in reality a mask for self-consciousness. He was eloquent even in private conversation, but a very easy man to converse with. His rhetorical public prose struck me as just a studied elaboration of his natural eloquence.

I am aware that General MacArthur impressed people quite differently, and doubtless he was a contradictory character. A friendly fellow-general once remarked to me that he had about him a bit of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. That may help explain his appeal to both reactionaries and liberals. But however one judges his historic role, none would deny the impressive impact he made on all by powerful human qualities: his deep dedication to whatever he undertook, his sense of justice, his high principles and his firm ideals. It was a privilege to witness their expression in the memorable days of his one historic civilian role. It was the role in which, as a man of peace, he said he hoped most to be remembered.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x