Foreign Policy: Will Obama Acknowledge Challenges in State of the Union?

Foreign Policy: Will Obama Acknowledge Challenges in State of the Union?

Foreign Policy: Will Obama Acknowledge Challenges in State of the Union?

Yes, it’s a speech about jobs, jobs, jobs. But let’s keep an eye on the rest of the world, too.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

President Obama has released an outline of his foreign policy achievements to be included in the State of the Union address tonight. As expected, he touts the end of the war in Iraq, the killing of Osama bin Laden, and the drawdown in Afghanistan:

“For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq. We’ve decimated al Qaeda’s leadership, delivered justice to Osama bin Laden, and put that terrorist network on the path to defeat. We’ve made important progress in Afghanistan, and begun a transition so Afghans can assume more responsibility. We joined with allies and partners to protect the Libyan people as they ended the regime of [Muammar Qaddafi].”

But the outline says not a word about the problems he faces and hasn’t solved. Above all, it says nothing about Iran, where a confrontation is looming and his Republican rivals are accusing the president of appeasement. Let’s hope the fact that Obama doesn’t mention Iran, and generally avoids a chip-on-the-shoulder attitude in favor of emphasizing the end of one war and the coming end of another is a sign that Obama will avoid belligerence in his speech tonight. Specifically, when it comes to Iran, let’s see how strongly he reaffirms his earlier commitment to diplomacy and engagement.

Meanwhile, Iraq is a mess, relations with China are tense over the White House’s “pivot” toward what looks like a containment policy against Beijing, the Arab Spring has gotten ugly, parts of Africa (especially Nigeria) are unraveling, and Russia is enmeshed in turmoil, rebellion, and a slide toward dictatorship. Yes, it’s a speech about jobs, jobs, jobs. But let’s keep an eye on the rest of the world, too.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x