Flying Hippopotamus Over Afghanistan: $500 Million-Plus

Flying Hippopotamus Over Afghanistan: $500 Million-Plus

Flying Hippopotamus Over Afghanistan: $500 Million-Plus

White House tells defense contractors not to worry themselves about spending cuts.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The Pentagon has officially outdone itself: even as the war in Afghanistan winds down to its unhappy denouement, the Department of Defense is deploying what the Wall Street Journal calls a “football-field-size airship laden with surveillance gear,” essentially a gigantic blimp that will float over the county like a giant alien spaceship from Independence Day. Which, come to think of it, is exactly how Afghans might view it.

No one has seen the damn thing yet, but it’s likely to take flight soon on a test run in New Jersey at the same airfield where the Hindenburg blimp exploded and burned.

The paper doesn’t say how much the gargantuan item costs, but its initial contract was for $517 million, and naturally it’s late, plagued by the usual delays and cost overruns.

Reports the Journal (and you’ll need a subscription to read the whole article):

The experimental craft, known as the Long Endurance Multi-Intelligence Vehicle, or LEMV, is designed to loiter over combat zones for weeks at a time, outfitted with high-tech sensors that can intercept phone calls, shoot full-motion video or track the movement of insurgents.

One more thing, says the Journal: the DOD is having trouble figuring out where to park it:

What’s more, the Army will have to figure out one other issue: where in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region to park the massive airship for maintenance.

This comes amidst building pressure on Capitol Hill to find a way around the sequestration cuts that supposedly will slice into the DOD budget at the end of the year. (In fact, defense firms are quietly being told that they won’t happen.) Imagine how much $517 million-plus-overruns could do if it were used to provide, say, healthcare services to Afghans—or, of course, hire teachers, cops and firemen at home.

As The Hill reports, the Republicans in Congress—led by bombs-away John McCain—are demanding that Democrats stop the measly cuts, although in fact the DOD budget could be slashed far more with little impact on national security, and the money used to create non-military-related jobs at home. Says The Hill:

In a sternly worded letter, House Armed Services Committee chief Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) accused Reid and Senate Democrats of blocking a vote on a Republican-drafted plan to avoid the budget cuts under the so-called sequestration plan.

But McKeon, an über-hawk, is letting it be known that even the White House is saying that the strikebreaking military-industrial giant Lockheed doesn’t have to worry about the cuts:

President Barack Obama’s White House has told at least one defense contractor not to worry — sequestration isn’t really going to happen. According to House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Acting Director Jeffrey Zients told Lockheed Martin CEO Bob Stevens not to worry about the potential sequester.

 

 

And, of course, soon the flying hippopotamus will be in the skies over Afghanistan.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x