Flying Hippopotamus Over Afghanistan: $500 Million-Plus

Flying Hippopotamus Over Afghanistan: $500 Million-Plus

Flying Hippopotamus Over Afghanistan: $500 Million-Plus

White House tells defense contractors not to worry themselves about spending cuts.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The Pentagon has officially outdone itself: even as the war in Afghanistan winds down to its unhappy denouement, the Department of Defense is deploying what the Wall Street Journal calls a “football-field-size airship laden with surveillance gear,” essentially a gigantic blimp that will float over the county like a giant alien spaceship from Independence Day. Which, come to think of it, is exactly how Afghans might view it.

No one has seen the damn thing yet, but it’s likely to take flight soon on a test run in New Jersey at the same airfield where the Hindenburg blimp exploded and burned.

The paper doesn’t say how much the gargantuan item costs, but its initial contract was for $517 million, and naturally it’s late, plagued by the usual delays and cost overruns.

Reports the Journal (and you’ll need a subscription to read the whole article):

The experimental craft, known as the Long Endurance Multi-Intelligence Vehicle, or LEMV, is designed to loiter over combat zones for weeks at a time, outfitted with high-tech sensors that can intercept phone calls, shoot full-motion video or track the movement of insurgents.

One more thing, says the Journal: the DOD is having trouble figuring out where to park it:

What’s more, the Army will have to figure out one other issue: where in the Afghanistan-Pakistan region to park the massive airship for maintenance.

This comes amidst building pressure on Capitol Hill to find a way around the sequestration cuts that supposedly will slice into the DOD budget at the end of the year. (In fact, defense firms are quietly being told that they won’t happen.) Imagine how much $517 million-plus-overruns could do if it were used to provide, say, healthcare services to Afghans—or, of course, hire teachers, cops and firemen at home.

As The Hill reports, the Republicans in Congress—led by bombs-away John McCain—are demanding that Democrats stop the measly cuts, although in fact the DOD budget could be slashed far more with little impact on national security, and the money used to create non-military-related jobs at home. Says The Hill:

In a sternly worded letter, House Armed Services Committee chief Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) accused Reid and Senate Democrats of blocking a vote on a Republican-drafted plan to avoid the budget cuts under the so-called sequestration plan.

But McKeon, an über-hawk, is letting it be known that even the White House is saying that the strikebreaking military-industrial giant Lockheed doesn’t have to worry about the cuts:

President Barack Obama’s White House has told at least one defense contractor not to worry — sequestration isn’t really going to happen. According to House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Acting Director Jeffrey Zients told Lockheed Martin CEO Bob Stevens not to worry about the potential sequester.

 

 

And, of course, soon the flying hippopotamus will be in the skies over Afghanistan.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x