In Fact…

In Fact…

‘TAINT FUNNY, COLBERT

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

‘TAINT FUNNY, COLBERT

The Bushes were not amused by Stephen Colbert’s hilarious, barbed monologue at the White House correspondents’ dinner. Neither was the audience. The Washington Post‘s Dana Milbank sniffed that Colbert was “not terribly funny,” the standard statement when you politically disapprove of a joke. As Greg Mitchell points out in Editor & Publisher, at the 2004 radio and TV correspondents’ bash, Bush showed photos of himself searching the Oval Office, commenting: “Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be somewhere.” Some of us thought the joke tasteless, but the DC press laughed it up.

TRY HUMAN INTELLIGENCE

People in the CIA’s clandestine services spy and lie for their country, but there are some ethical people in the agency. Mary McCarthy, for one. She was fired, allegedly, for leaking information about the agency’s practice of “extraordinary rendition”–sending prisoners to secret torture sites. And then there’s Ray McGovern, the retired twenty-seven-year agency veteran who raked Defense Secretary Rumsfeld with questions like, When was he lying about Iraq’s Al Qaeda ties and WMDs, and when did he know it? Since Bush’s choice for CIA director, Gen. Michael Hayden, is tainted (see page 3), we nominate McGovern for the post. As his press officer, how about Mary McCarthy?

LAWRENCE LADER

Lawrence Lader, a pioneering crusader for abortion rights, died May 7, aged 86. Lader wrote a hugely influential 1966 book, starkly titled Abortion, which was so well researched and argued the Supreme Court cited it in Roe v. Wade. In 1976, three years after that decision, he wrote prophetically in this magazine: “The growing denial of abortion rights…has not come from highly publicized Constitutional amendments but from a new and almost unnoticed danger: the refusal of abortion services.”

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x