In Fact…

In Fact…

KENNETH CLARK

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

KENNETH CLARK

“Racial considerations intruding upon the educational process contaminate education at the source,” Kenneth Clark wrote in these pages in 1979. As an African-American and the son of a trade-union shop steward, Clark believed in equality. As a psychologist, he believed in evidence. It was the combined commitment to evidence and equality that lent his studies on children of segregated schools such authority they became the basis for the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision. Until his death on May 1, just shy of Brown‘s fifty-first anniversary, Clark remained fiercely attached to those principles. By every measure he was able to define–children’s self-esteem, students’ performance on tests, flow of education dollars–separate-but-equal remained for Clark “a contradiction in terms for blacks,” even when expressed through such institutions as historically black colleges. His unwavering dedication to the core analysis of Brown led him to condemn, at various junctures, African-American separatism, Jewish racism, New York community school boards and liberal white intellectuals who “have lost all empathy with low-income people and black people.” Clark was as hard on his own early naïve optimism, and he understood that the courts, Justice Department and some black leaders long ago wrote off the Second Reconstruction promised by Brown. But he refused any intellectual accommodation with resegregation. Kenneth Clark was one of the country’s great truth-tellers.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x