Escalation Opponents Hold White House Vigil

Escalation Opponents Hold White House Vigil

Escalation Opponents Hold White House Vigil

One of over a thousand anti-escalation events taking place around the country.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Keith White

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Over 200 individuals held vigil outside the White House, protesting President Bush’s plan for a troop escalation in Iraq. Organized by DC for Democracy, Moveon.org lent its support, inviting their members to participate in the evening rally. The DC event was one of over a thousand anti-escalation events taking place around the country, Moveon.org and Win Without War stated at a press conference earlier today. Speakers at the event included Mike Shore of DC for Democracy, Tom Andrews of Win Without War, and Read Yarrar of the Institute for Policy Studies, with Congressman Lynn Woolsey expected to appear later this evening.

America’s youth were represented within the vigil, but not as much as some hoped for. “I am kind of disappointed, seeing as we’re in the heart of our nation and this whole field isn’t filled,” said Shanna Devine, 20, a student at Occidental College. But Devine continued by focusing on what those present were accomplishing. “If we don’t voice ourselves other people won’t have a chance voice themselves, and then politics will continue rolling,” Devine contended. She bemoaned President Bush’s decision to increase U.S. troops in Iraq at a time “when they have soldiers in Iraq saying we are not helping and we need to leave, when the public is saying we need to leave, when they have reports put together for people who work for Bush Senior saying we need to pull out of Iraq. And still he’s [George W. Bush] saying we need to send more troops.”

For others, the Bush administration’s policies in Iraq had a direct impact on their families. “I personally have a cousin who is in Afghanistan, and I’m supporting him,” said. Monica La, 24. “This is a show of support for him, but it’s also a support for what I think is right. We have to stop this escalation; I want to bring him home.”

Connie Clayton, 18, spoke of her brother who just returned from multiple tours aboard. “I have a brother who’s already been in Iraq twice and Afghanistan once,” Clayton said. “For him to get deployed again is not really something any of us want to go through and I think everyone knows that this isn’t what Americans want right now.”

When it came to stopping the President’s Iraq strategy, there was both hope and pessimism within the crowd. “I understand the reality of not being able to realistically just stop the war,” La said. “But we can stop escalation?that’s a first step. I think that’s a realistic request for Congress.” “Saying your fed up is probably the first part of it,” Clayton contended. “You might as well try because that’s the only thing people can do.” Josh Tong, 22, added, “There are very few people that want to send troops, and I think it takes some people to stand up and speak out before other people have the confidence to stand up too.”

While falling far short of the projected 500 attendees, the vigil was a clear statement to anyone watching inside the White House. Whether this is just the beginning of a vibrant anti-escalation movement to consummate during the national march on January 27, or merely the reaction of a vocal few has yet to be seen. But with 60 percent of the American public against the troop surge after President Bush’s speech last evening, the ranks of the Iraq anti-war movement are growing.

Note: This report was compiled and published before the vigil’s conclusion.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x