Equal Obliviousness, Not Equal Rights

Equal Obliviousness, Not Equal Rights

Although pundits galore like to do it—a lot—it makes no sense to lump the sexes into undifferentiated groups.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The Atlantic published one of many recent articles about the "he-cession" or the "decline of men," wondering what it means that women are now the majority of the workforce, the majority of breadwinners, et cetera. "What if the economics of the new era are better suited to women?" asked author Hanna Rosin.

Not so fast. After all, the majority of power positions—the presidency, Congress, CEOs and boardrooms—are still filled with men. And although pundits galore like to do it—a lot—it makes no sense to lump the sexes into undifferentiated groups.

As Daisy Hernandez at ColorLines points out: The "He-cession" could be properly termed a "black-cession." White men still have a lower than average unemployment rate (8.8 percent), while black men are soaring over it—at 17 percent. Our still-segregated school system still plays a role—the so-called school-to-jail pipeline doesn’t typically funnel more white males to prison than college.

Sure, upper-class white women may be moving into some more positions of power—take former CEOs Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina, now buying their way into politics. But Rosin’s idea of a "sisterhood" involves domestic jobs opening up when those women go to work—which, Hernandez points out, means women of color cleaning affluent houses. That’s not exactly the sisterhood we’d been thinking of.

More gender equality at the top’s a fine thing, as Melissa Harris-Lacewell pointed out here last month. But let’s not pretend that privileged white women catching up to white men as the whole economy tanks is synonymous with liberation for the gender. As we’ve seen with the "year of the right-wing women" in politics, sometimes equality is simply being as oblivious to privilege as those stuffed shirts that came before you.

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Support us by signing up for our podcast, and follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x