The Environment Is in Trump’s Crosshairs. We Need to Fight Back.

The Environment Is in Trump’s Crosshairs. We Need to Fight Back.

The Environment Is in Trump’s Crosshairs. We Need to Fight Back.

This isn’t scattershot; it is a well-planned effort to destroy environmental regulations and investments built up over decades.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Don’t get distracted by Trump’s ludicrous claim that he’s against energy-efficient light bulbs because they make him look orange. That may or may not be the case—but it’s certainly not the main reason his administration is moving full throttle to dismantle decades of environmental regulations, any more than his opposition to wind power has to do with his loony notion that windmills cause cancer.

Over the past weeks, the administration, in league with Big Oil and other fossil fuel industries, has gone full-bore in its efforts to roll back half a century of environmental regulations. Pay attention, America. This isn’t scattershot; it is a concerted, well-planned effort to neutralize environmental regulations and investments built up over decades.

A few examples: In late August, the administration announced plans to end restrictions on methane emissions, despite the fact that methane is a powerful contributor to global warming. That month it also moved to allow logging in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest. And last week it eradicated Obama-era regulations, building on the 1972 Clean Water Act, that limited industry’s ability to use polluting chemicals near waterways. It also moved to open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas drilling by year’s end.

Lest anyone doubt how retrograde this moment is, GOP senators have begun floating proposals not only to eliminate the federal tax credits that come with purchasing electric vehicles, but even to subject them to a road-usage tax in lieu of the gasoline taxes that owners of such cars don’t pay. The latter measure has already been successfully pushed by the American Legislative Exchange Council, which coordinates conservative policy proposals for state governments, in more than two dozen states in recent years. Implemented federally, these proposals would stifle the development of the still-fragile, and urgently needed, electric vehicle market.

All of this was capped by the September revelation that the Trump administration may be preparing to withdraw the long-standing waivers allowing California to set its own tailgate-emissions and fuel-efficiency standards for vehicles; 13 other states (14, if Colorado, which recently voted to join the compact, is counted) use California’s standards rather than the lower federal ones. The waiver withdrawal deliberately sabotages states’ ability to curtail global warming.

California, is, of course, fighting back with increasingly radical countermeasures. Last week, legislators passed SB1, intended to preserve, in legislative amber, vital federal environmental and labor regulations in the shape that they existed on the last day of Obama’s presidency. The provisions of SB1 would have remained in place through a possible second Trump term, expiring the day after the 2025 presidential inauguration.

At the urging of Senator Dianne Feinstein and Central Valley water interests, however, who fear it would break apart a delicate set of water agreements brokered at the federal level, Governor Gavin Newsom has indicated that he will veto the measure. But other imaginative and powerful policy measures will almost certainly follow. Stay focused; pay attention; filter out the noise—the environmental battle has truly been joined. It’s time to take sides.

Listen to Abramsky on the Start Making Sense podcast.

We need your support

What’s at stake this November is the future of our democracy. Yet Nation readers know the fight for justice, equity, and peace doesn’t stop in November. Change doesn’t happen overnight. We need sustained, fearless journalism to advocate for bold ideas, expose corruption, defend our democracy, secure our bodily rights, promote peace, and protect the environment.

This month, we’re calling on you to give a monthly donation to support The Nation’s independent journalism. If you’ve read this far, I know you value our journalism that speaks truth to power in a way corporate-owned media never can. The most effective way to support The Nation is by becoming a monthly donor; this will provide us with a reliable funding base.

In the coming months, our writers will be working to bring you what you need to know—from John Nichols on the election, Elie Mystal on justice and injustice, Chris Lehmann’s reporting from inside the beltway, Joan Walsh with insightful political analysis, Jeet Heer’s crackling wit, and Amy Littlefield on the front lines of the fight for abortion access. For as little as $10 a month, you can empower our dedicated writers, editors, and fact checkers to report deeply on the most critical issues of our day.

Set up a monthly recurring donation today and join the committed community of readers who make our journalism possible for the long haul. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth and justice—can you help us thrive for 160 more?

Onwards,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x