The Dubai Farce

The Dubai Farce

What a farce: The Dubai Ports deal shows Bush is willing to trust the Arab-owned Dubai Ports to manage our harbors, even as he scapegoats them as culprits in his war on terror.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Do you buy Dubai? That’s this season’s big hit, a zany farce with pompous officials in the Bush Administration and their hysterical courtiers in the mass media asserting positions that are patently absurd but hilarious to watch. Audiences are eating it up.

Great fun–but not for everyone. Feel the pain over at Fox television. How do you go on stoking xenophobic hysteria against the Arabs when the Golden Boy in the White House has turned over management of American ports to an emir who once backed the Taliban? OK, so now he’s a good guy, responding to Daddy Bush’s charity pitch by throwing $100 million to Katrina victims, and before that another million into the Bush presidential library. But how do you sell that to a Fox television audience brainwashed to believe that Saddam Hussein is indistinguishable from Osama bin Laden because they both speak Arabic?

Oh, to be Lou Dobbs over at CNN, who never liked anyone connected with the Mideast, including the President, and who now sends reporters out in the dark of night to track mysterious cargo. Some guys have all the fun–particularly those traitors who don’t realize there is a war on and that it’s our patriotic duty to support the President, even if he’s endangering the country.

Now, maybe this port deal is not really that big a threat to US security, but then neither was Saddam Hussein. That didn’t stop Bush from ripping up Iraq and turning it into a showcase for religious fratricide. So he makes mistakes, but he’s our President and we are in a WAR, a War on Terror. Terror, terror, TERROR, all the time.

But now, we’re getting mixed messages. First, the President told us that in a war on terror you trust your own government to provide Homeland Security. You put your faith in the stern, electronic wand-waving Americans in white shirts and TSA epaulettes who check your shoes at the airport; those upstanding Americans who report to other upstanding Americans, like Michael Chertoff, and people he trusts. Now they tell us it’s OK to have some Arab as the guy in charge of checking our shoes–excuse me, ports?

Yeah, I know, to be the least bit queasy about turning over our ports to guys who supported the Taliban when that bunch of religious maniacs were harboring bin Laden is, as the Bush apologists tell us, just xenophobic. Dubai was not alone; Saudi Arabia and Pakistan did the same, and they are now trusted allies. These are crazy times, and there are some unnerving oddities in Bush’s foreign policy, but don’t worry: As soon as Hussein is tried and hanged, democracy will flower in the Arab world and the war on terrorism will be over. In the meantime, we have to put up with some contradictions, like trusting Arabs to own port-management companies, even as we scapegoat them everywhere else.

And even if you are a teensy-weensy nervous about it, remember that the Bushies have made it clear that the management companies don’t have anything to do with port security, because that’s safely in the hands of US Customs and the US Coast Guard.

Ooops, well, not according to the Coast Guard.

Just when things looked like they were quieting down, Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine, chair of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, had to go and mess it up for the President by releasing details of a very embarrassing Coast Guard warning that the White House had ignored. “There are many intelligence gaps, concerning the potential for [Dubai Ports World]…assets to support terrorist operations, that preclude an overall threat assessment of the potential merger,” stated the Coast Guard document.

No biggie. I get it, when it comes to national security, who are you going to trust, the President of the United States, our commander in chief or those sailor boys in the Coast Guard who are already backing off? But this is a very unpopular lame duck President, and some Republican legislators are getting nervous. For example Collins, who broke ranks to warn, “This report suggests there were significant and troubling intelligence gaps … That language is very troubling to me.”

Hey, no problem, reassures fellow Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona. It could be worse–the port managers could be Chinese communists! The Chinese are even less free than the people of Dubai, he insists, so we’ve dodged a bullet there. Some spoilsports might point out that Beijing never recognized the Taliban and hardly coddles religious fanatics. But that would ruin this wonderful farce, and I wish it a very long run. Do you buy Dubai? Yeah, loved every minute.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x