Democrats Win Another GOP House Seat

Democrats Win Another GOP House Seat

Democrats took another Republican-held U.S. House seat in a special election Saturday, suggesting that the party remains on track for significant expansion of its congressional majorities in 2008.

Louisiana Democrat Don Cazayoux, a young moderate with state legislative experience, snatched a seat that Republicans had held since the 1970s by a 49-46 margin over a well-funded campaign by veteran Republican legislator Woody Jenkins.

The win extends the Democratic majority in the House to 235-198 and it continues a pattern of special-election wins for the party in seats that have traditionally been thought of as Republican strongholds — including the Illinois turf of former House Speaker Dennis Hastert.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Democrats took another Republican-held U.S. House seat in a special election Saturday, suggesting that the party remains on track for significant expansion of its congressional majorities in 2008.

Louisiana Democrat Don Cazayoux, a young moderate with state legislative experience, snatched a seat that Republicans had held since the 1970s by a 49-46 margin over a well-funded campaign by veteran Republican legislator Woody Jenkins.

The win extends the Democratic majority in the House to 235-198 and it continues a pattern of special-election wins for the party in seats that have traditionally been thought of as Republican strongholds — including the Illinois turf of former House Speaker Dennis Hastert.

But it does something far more significant.

Republicans and their allied special-interest groups had sought to save the seat by “nationalizing” — or, to be more precise, racializing — the contest with a campaign that sought to tie Cazayoux to Democratic presidential frontrunner Barack Obama. Hoping to capitalize on concerns about Obama’s former minister, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, in order to exploit racial divisions in the south and other regions of recent Republican strength, GOP operatives have developed advertising schemes that feature images of Obama, Wright and local Democratic candidates.

The strategy was implemented in Louisiana and is also being used in an upcoming Mississippi special election.

The Louisiana results had Maryland Congressman Chris Van Hollen, the able chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, declaring, “Republicans were reminded that ‘all politics is local.’ House Republicans tried to nationalize this election, illegally coordinated with Freedom’s Watch, used false and deceptive special interest smears, and funneled nearly a million dollars into a district that Republicans held for more than three decades.”

But don’t expect the Republicans, who have struggled to come up with a plan to divert voter attention from economic and foreign-policy concerns, to abandon plans to exploit racial divisions in upcoming contests.

Cazayoux was an attractive candidate with deep Louisiana roots, while Jenkins was a controversial figure even in Republican circles — in no small part because of his past ties to former Ku Klux Klansman David Duke. And still the final result was a close one.

That has encouraged National Republican Congressional Committee, which argued that the anti-Obama campaigning helped Jenkins make up “substantial ground” in the closing days of the contest.

“This election speaks to the potential toxicity of an Obama candidacy and the possible drag he could have down-ballot this fall,” argued the NRCC team in a memo that, despite its sore-loser tone, makes clear the intention of the Republican party to make the fall campaign one very long, and very ugly, “Willie Horton” ad.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x