Cyberwar: When We Do It, It’s OK; If They Do It, It’s War

Cyberwar: When We Do It, It’s OK; If They Do It, It’s War

Cyberwar: When We Do It, It’s OK; If They Do It, It’s War

The ultimate in cyber-hypocrisy from the Pentagon.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The ultimate, perhaps, in hypocrisy? Though it’s widely been reported that the United States and Israel worked together to sabotage Iran’s nuclear program by means of a cyberattack, one using a computer worm called Stuxnet that wrecked as many as a thousand of Iran’s centrifuges, now the Pentagon says that if anyone does anything like that to us, it’s an act of war—and the United States might feel free to retaliate using military means.

Reported the New York Times yesterday:

“The Pentagon, trying to create a formal strategy to deter cyberattacks on the United States, plans to issue a new strategy soon declaring that a computer attack from a foreign nation can be considered an act of war that may result in a military response.”

 It’s a policy under development by the Obama administration for two years, as the article points out:

“In May 2009…the head of the United States Strategic Command, Gen. Kevin P. Chilton, told reporters that in the event of a cyberattack ‘the law of armed conflict will apply,’ and warned that ‘I don’t think you take anything off the table’ ” in considering a response. ‘Why would we constrain ourselves?’ he asked, according to an article about his comments that appeared in Stars and Stripes."

And if Iran had not “constrained itself” after the US-Israeli sabotage campaign, which is ongoing and which, apparently, involves the kidnapping and assassination of Iranian scientists, too? Don’t ask.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x