Congressman Eric Cantor, R-Unethical

Congressman Eric Cantor, R-Unethical

Virginia Congressman Eric Cantor has taken a lead in Republican attacks on expanding role of the federal government.

But there are some expansions of government that do not bother the conservative stalwart.

For instance, Cantor does not appear to have any problem with the government funding his political projects.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Virginia Congressman Eric Cantor has taken a lead in Republican attacks on expanding role of the federal government.

But there are some expansions of government that do not bother the conservative stalwart.

For instance, Cantor does not appear to have any problem with the government funding his political projects.

Earlier this year, with as much fanfare as a beaten party can muster, congressional Republicans launched an initiative to “rebrand” their party as something voters might actually find appealing.

Cantor and his compatriots called their project the National Council for a New America.

And, while it has yet to come up with anything “new” in the way of policy or vision, the Republican political initiative is up and running — thanks to the federal government.

The council is being run out of Cantor’s congressional office, and the anti-corruption group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is asking why.

This week, CREW filed a complaint with the House Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) against Cantor and requesting an investigation into the National Council for a New America.

CREW’s complaint: The Republican council ought not be run out of Cantor’s congressional office when it has an exclusively political purpose.

“Applying the old adage: if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it probably is a duck, NCNA looks political and Representative Cantor and the group’s other members talk about it in political terms so it must be a political organization,” explained CREW executive director Melanie Sloan. “The real reason Representative Cantor is disingenuously claiming the group is a policy organization is to leave American taxpayers footing NCNA’s bills. The Office of Congressional Ethics should make it perfectly clear: lawmakers are free to create political organizations, but they can’t use our money to pay for them.”

Here’s CREW complaint regarding Congressman Eric Cantor, R-Unethical.

Hard-core partisans may try to defend Cantor’s wrongdoing with the old Washington-insider claim that CREW is only attacking the congressman because he is a Republican.

Unfortunately for this “defense,” CREW’s other big project of the moment is lawsuit seeking records of visits by top healthcare executives to the White House — the point of which is to determine “the extent to which these industry players may have influenced the administration’s healthcare policy.”

The bottom line: CREW really is nonpartisan.

Cantor, on the other hand, is not just partisan.

The congressman — who rants and raves so regularly about fiscal responsibility — appears to be raiding the federal treasury in order to fund his partisanship.

The Office of Congressional Ethics needs to open an investigation of Cantor’s machinations.

And the congressman’s constituents need to ask why, at a time when Cantor says the federal government does not have the money to pay for healthcare and education, it seems to have more than enough money to pay for the congressman’s politicking.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x