Censorship Battle Roils University of Georgia Student Paper

Censorship Battle Roils University of Georgia Student Paper

Censorship Battle Roils University of Georgia Student Paper

Student staff members of the University of Georgia’s newspaper resigned recently following a decision by the administrative board to hire 10 full-time non-student staff members to edit and censor the publication.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Student staff members of the University of Georgia’s newspaper, Red and Black, resigned recently following a decision by the administrative board to hire 10 full-time non-student staff members to edit and censor the publication.

Former student editor Polina Marinova released a statement on Facebook and Twitter explaining the reasons behind the walkout and defended the students’ protest against administrative censorship.  Writing in the Columbia Journalism Review, recent University of GA graduate Andria Krewson explained that "the biggest threat to the students was the elevation of a professional editorial adviser to editorial ‘director,’ with the mission to edit and advise the students and approve content before publication." The changes were conveyed to Marinova, who had spent the summer interning at CNN, as a fait accompli, and the paper’s editorial director shared with her a poorly written draft memo from the consultant.

In the last two years, the student paper has shifted to online publication in order to communicate with “a generation which grew up with computers, cell phones and iPods” and currently only produces one print edition each week.

Krewson smartly sums up: "Perhaps the broader lessons going forward: Those who treasure the institutions that educated generations of journalists cannot let old structures ossify. More than 30 years ago, many of us felt we had solved the problems of independence for student voices when The Red and Black became independent of the university. Clearly, it’s a battle that needs to be fought time and again. We’ve been discussing it on an alumni Facebook group that grew from 165 members to more than 350 in three days, with concrete steps planned soon as well as watchful eyes. The whole thing is far from over."
 

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x