Britain and Greece: Democracy vs. the Markets

Britain and Greece: Democracy vs. the Markets

Britain and Greece: Democracy vs. the Markets

Protesters in London are calling on Nick Clegg to hold out for electoral reform, but both in Britain and in Greece "the markets" are squeezing democracy.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Two days after Britain’s inconclusive election, a thousand or so protesters dressed in suffrage purple have gathered outside the building in London where Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg is meeting with his MPs to discuss his response to the blandishments of the two major parties, both wooing him to support their claim to power. They’re chanting “Fair Votes Now,” “My Vote Counts,” “You Serve Us,” and “We Want Nick” to stiffen his spine against any deal he might make that doesn’t guarantee electoral reform. I’m watching it on TV as I write, and Clegg has just come out to address  the crowd. He’s saying he genuinely believes it is in the national interest to use this opportunity to usher in a new politics, thanking them for their campaign, urging them to take it to every street and every town in Britain. They are cheering wildly. Cleggmania may have fizzled in the voting booth, but it seems to have sparked a different kind of flame. It looks like Britain now has a democracy movement.

This is a very British protest, a million miles from the demonstrations in Greece last week, in which three bank workers died when a petrol bomb was thrown into their building. But they’re connected. In Greece, a democratically elected socialist government has been forced by the EU and the IMF to impose intolerable austerity measures because “the markets” have speculated wildly on its debt. In Britain, “the markets” are putting pressure on the politicians to reach a fast resolution to the uncertainty the election has produced—which means, as the  Financial Times opines, “a deal between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats.”  On Thursday night, the BBC paused at regular intervals in its election coverage to take sterling’s temperature. It was as if, as Princess Diana once said, there were three parties to this marriage: the voters, the candidates, and "the markets," a "jittery" beast that must be constantly "reassured" lest it should turn on us and tear us all to shreds. “The markets,” says BBC business correspondent Robert Peston, want “a stable government perceived to be tackling the public-sector deficit in a serious, substantial way”—code for Cameron in Downing Street with a solid majority, however he can cobble it together. The media—and David Cameron—have repeatedly threatened that Britain might “turn into Greece.”

Of course, there’s nothing new about this kind of pressure—except, perhaps, how openly it is now brought to bear. Hanging over this weekend’s negotiations in London is the memory of the 1970s, where a series of hung parliaments and minority governments led to a sterling crisis and the ignominious arrival of the IMF—which led to Margaret Thatcher’s election in 1979. More power to the purple people gathered now in London. They may find that they’ve taken on more than they bargained for.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x