Thank You, Comrade Greider

Thank You, Comrade Greider

Bill Greider spared no one his incisive political criticism—on the left or the right. “I think this country needs to start over,” he once wrote me.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

In the hours after the September 11 attacks, the Nation editors debated what our lead editorial should say in the issue that would go to press the next day. Should we focus on domestic aspects or international ones, on the role of the US in the world or the role of religious fanaticism?

It was Bill Greider who made us understand what mattered: He gave us the thoughts, and then the words, that became The Nation’s response. Informed by the same deep humanity that Bill brought to all his work, the editorial began: “We have taken a great wound, we Americans, and our first task is to rescue survivors if that is still possible, to grieve and to remain alert until we better understand what happened to us.”

Later, it went on, there would be plenty of time to seek out causes and assign blame, but for now, we just needed to absorb the ghastly images and deal with the fear and heartsickness that followed.

Bill’s instinct to see the world in terms of people is what made him so remarkably successful in getting beyond the hot air that passes for sophisticated economic and political discourse in most settings, and what made him such a hero to so many young people.

I witnessed this for myself a decade later when he came to the Kennedy School at Harvard to accept an award for outstanding political reporting. After his remarks at the awards ceremony and a subsequent panel discussion, he was mobbed by students who were thrilled by his blunt comments (which clearly did not sit well with the Harvard higher-ups) about the role of the bankers and the Washington insiders in the 2008 financial crisis. I wrote to Katrina vanden Heuvel afterward, “Maybe the magazine should just pay Bill to go around lobbing little bomblets into stuffy gatherings of the elite.”

Nor did progressives escape his criticism. In an e-mail exchange in late 2011, he told me that he was disgusted with what he saw as the self-delusions of the left. “I think this country needs to start over,” he said. “Confess all lies, admit our crimes and arrogance, apologize to our ancestors” and develop a new political party.

A couple years later, in a similar frame of mind, he wrote about having been in recent contact with his friend Larry Goodwyn, a Duke historian, then on the verge of death. “He liked to call me ‘comrade’ which was our little joke since we are neither left nor right in the usual sense,” Bill wrote. “Larry and I share a view of what democracy means—an unfinished human struggle.”

Dear Comrade Bill, thank you. A luta continua.

Can we count on you?

In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.

We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.

Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.

Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.

Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation

Ad Policy
x