Big Media, Bad News

Big Media, Bad News

Media consolidation is creeping in slowly while the public’s attention is elsewhere—is it too late to fight back?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

As the US war on terrorism hurtles forward into a hazily defined post-Afghanistan phase, the news is not good: Although some of the press has lately made efforts to cover the turbulent world outside our borders, the attention has been too little and too late. Those charged with promoting the media's social obligations, moreover, are openly disdainful of that mission. As Mark Crispin Miller notes in this special issue, FCC chairman Michael Powell speaks mockingly of some imaginary "angel of the public interest" while observing as his sacred duty the protection of corporate media interests–most recently, taking advantage of the nation's distraction on September 13 to "review" (read, throw out) rules prohibiting a single company from owning a daily paper and TV station in the same market.

Encouraged by such regulatory indulgences, the media and entertainment giants profiled in our latest chart–"The Big Ten," on page 27 and also accessible at www.thenation.com–continue their shape-shifting so as to exploit every possible opportunity for internal synergy. The latest of these contortions to make headlines was the move by Vivendi, just last year a stodgy French utilities firm, to acquire the entertainment arm of Barry Diller's USA Networks and a stake in the satellite TV firm EchoStar. Vivendi Universal Entertainment, the new combined entity that Diller will run, is now free to devote glowing coverage on its television channels to the latest blockbuster from its own Universal Studios.

Overt instances of cross-promotion are increasingly common, but they are only part of the problem. The domination of the media by entertainment conglomerates has a corrosive impact on journalism, blurring the line between news and entertainment to near- invisibility. "Profit pressures produce a dumbing down of journalism," writes former FCC commissioner Nicholas Johnson in our forum on the Big Ten chart. "The media choose content not to educate or inform but to pander to the consumers advertisers most desire." As always, there are exceptions. In the music industry–as Artemis Records CEO Danny Goldberg notes in the forum–popular demand for edgy, stimulating fare exerts a positive influence on the decision-making of white, middle-aged executives. But by and large, the corporate media have failed spectacularly when it comes to nurturing a democratic and humane society. The next front is the Internet–still anarchic and open but vulnerable to moves by corporations to control its architecture as all media become interactive and the conglomerates jostle for position in cyberspace.

As Robert W. McChesney and John Nichols write, it is vital that progressives sustain independent media outlets (for a selection of readers' favorites, see "Letters," opposite), but it is not enough. "Our task is to return 'informed consent' to media policy-making," they argue, calling for a new national media reform coalition and defining a legislative agenda for such a movement. Without it, as they say, "We will continue to see special issues of The Nation like this one lamenting our situation." Next time, we hope to present a brighter picture.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x