The Bicycle Thief

The Bicycle Thief

Vittoria De Sica’s exploration of what an ordinary person must do to survive modern society is one of the landmark examples of neorealist cinema.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Vittoria De Sica’s exploration of what an ordinary person must do to survive modern society is one of the landmark examples of neorealist cinema.

Vittorio Do Sica’s The Bicycle Thief is a likable bit of pathos, not very originally conceived or executed, about a poor bill-poster whose bicycle is stolen. Accompanied by his son, he wanders through nearly every street in Rome trying unsuccessfully to get it back. The pace and the lighting turn The Bicycle Thief into a gently melancholic series of strolls in gray weather rather than a frantic search. Even when the hero runs after someone or pursues the thief in an automobile, the picture still seems to be strolling with the unhopeful, limitless leisure of the unemployed it depicts.

De Sica trios for realism by using nearly all non-professional actors and doing his shooting in the streets. Since he doesn’t concentrate on significant detail or get his players sufficiently loosened up to be natural, the film, except for its feel of poverty, comes out as somewhat less realistic than the average studio movie. However, The Bicycle Thief does have a certain ramshackle simplicity, quietness, and even naivete that are not unwelcome as a change from the stunning noise, ingenuity, and sophistication of Hollywood.

Among Hollywood’s most impressive recent efforts are three which deal, in timely fashion, with one of the major themes of the first half of the twentieth century—the failure of the charismatic personality. Young Man with a Horn, All the King’s Men, and Give Us This Day are remarkably similar in the seriousness and even the morbidity with which they treat, respectively, the haunted artist, politician, and worker. All three are based on novels of merit and manage to give them cinematic immediacy without debasing them excessively.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x