The Benefits of Long-Term Reform

The Benefits of Long-Term Reform

Hayes discusses his support of health care reform in the wake of its nation-wide unpopularity in the polls.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

In a recent op-ed column in The New York Times David Brooks
writes about the unpopularity of health care reform, writing, “If you
average the last ten polls, 38 percent of voters support the reform plan
and 53 percent oppose.” Should the Democrats try to pass the health care
reform regardless of the disapproval? The Nation‘s DC Edior,
Chris Hayes answers host Joe Scarborough’s question on The Morning
Joe
.

“Yes, is the short answer,” he says. “Those polls–if you break them
down, a significant chunk of the opposition are liberals who feel the
bill doesn’t go far enough. When you take that out, and you look at just
independents, they are split 50-50 on the bill.” Hayes argues that given
the context of Pentagon spending and war spending, the bill is actually
a “net deficit reducer.” The bill will do more for the 30 million
Americans that do not have health insurance and Democrats should push
for reform that seeks long-term benefits. “From the most crass political
calculation,” he says. “If you believe in the policy and you already
have taken the political hit, you should pass the bill.”

–Clarissa Leon

Check out more great Nation videos on our YouTube channel.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x