Being a Woman is Not a Pre-Existing Condition

Being a Woman is Not a Pre-Existing Condition

Being a Woman is Not a Pre-Existing Condition

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This post was written by Nation intern and freelance writer Fernanda Diaz.

One of the most appalling practices of the health insurance industry is to deny women coverage because of pregnancy, rape, domestic abuse or HIV medication–all of which have been discriminatorily labeled “pre-existing conditions” by some insurers. As the debate heats up over legislation about the “pre-existing condition” clause in many insurance programs, it’s crucial to remind Congress that being a woman is not a pre-existing condition.

The story of Christina Turner, uncovered by The Huffington Post Investigative Fund, reflects the staggering injustice that can result from lack of regulation of the grounds on which companies can deny coverage. Turner’s tale is not uncommon: she is a rape victim who was given anti-AIDS medicine after her sexual assault and was later denied coverage solely because of this preventative measure–insurers claimed that the HIV medication “raised too many health questions.” The company announced it might re-consider if, in three or more years, she could prove that she was AIDS free.

The less extreme cases are even more surprising. Under a federal law known as HIPAA, pregnancy is not allowed to be counted as a pre-existing condition–however, there are many loopholes, and pregnant women seeking individual plans or with slight abnormalities can be rejected despite this statute.

Health insurance companies take advantage of the American public simply because they can. Government needs to tell them to cease and desist with these discriminatory practices. The current effort to overhaul the healthcare industry must not neglect this institutionalized sexism, and you can help by calling on Congress to investigate these cases. Please contact your elected reps and ask them to consider these abuses and demand their redress as Congress continues to craft and debate new healthcare legislation for the American public.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x