Barbara Lee Wins a House Vote to Stop the Blank Checks for Endless War

Barbara Lee Wins a House Vote to Stop the Blank Checks for Endless War

Barbara Lee Wins a House Vote to Stop the Blank Checks for Endless War

Almost 18 years after Lee cast the sole vote against the open-ended AUMF, the House finally passed a bill that would sunset it.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

It has been almost 18 years since Congresswoman Barbara Lee cast the sole vote against the open-ended authorization of the use of military force, which then-President George W. Bush sought in response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Bush and his successors have continued to use the AUMF as a black check for endless war. And Lee has continued to object.

Finally, on Wednesday afternoon, after the House voted 226-203 to approve the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, Lee tweeted: “BREAKING: the House just passed a bill that includes my language to sunset the 2001 AUMF after 8 months.”

“For 18 years, the 2001 AUMF has been a blank check for endless war,” the California Democrat explained. “This is a huge step toward reasserting Congress’ constitutional authority on war & peace.”

Lee concluded this message with the words she has spoken and written and texted and tweeted so many times over the past decade “#StopEndlessWar.”

“This historic vote in the House is the closest Congress has come to repealing this blank check for war. This progress would not have been possible without the indefatigable work of Representative Barbara Lee (D-CA), who cast the sole vote in opposition to the war authorization in 2001 and who has campaigned for its repeal every since,” says Paul Kawika Martin, senior director for Policy and Political Affairs at Peace Action.

But Lee’s mission is not complete. “For the repeal of the 2001 AUMF to become law, the Senate will need to overcome its intransigence and stand by the House’s decision to reclaim Congress’ authority over war,” explained Martin, who notes that “Polls show the American people would reward such a decision.”

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x