The Ballad of Harvey Pitt

The Ballad of Harvey Pitt

(With apologies, once again, to Stephen Sondheim and his demon barber)

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

(With apologies, once again, to Stephen Sondheim and his demon barber)

Attend the tale of Harvey Pitt,
Who many thought was quite unfit
To choose who’ll be the referees
For people who paid him those fabulous fees.
It didn’t seem a perfect fit
For Harvey Pitt,

The fox who guarded the henhouse.

John Biggs was set to head the board.
But big accounting firms abhorred
The thought of someone so severe.
So little birds whispered in Harvey Pitt’s ear:
“Hi, Harvey.
Yes. Harvey Pitt,
Our fox who’s guarding the henhouse:

Rid yourself of Biggs, Harvey,
Biggs might know too much.
What we need’s a guy who’s just a bit out of touch.”

But who instead would Pitt recruit?
He’d need a man of high repute,
A man whose reputation’s grand–
Distinguished except for the matter at hand.
“Judge Webster’s it,”
Said Harvey Pitt,
The fox who guarded the henhouse.

The judge was hardly a CPA.
Pitt, though, managed to win the day.
He had the votes. He didn’t tell:
Webster’s boards also emitted a smell.
Harvey’d shot himself in the foot.
This meant Harvey was done–kaput.
Saying the truth wouldn’t have been brainy:
“Webster is cleaner than Bush or than Cheney.”
Harvey, Harvey, Harvey, Harvey, Harvey.

Attend the tale of Harvey Pitt,
Who thought he needn’t be legit
To regulate the SEC
For people as fond of the foxes as he.
Bye Harvey,
Poor Harvey Pitt,
The fox who guarded the henhouse.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x