Amend ‘Citizens United’ Out of Existence

Amend ‘Citizens United’ Out of Existence

Amend ‘Citizens United’ Out of Existence

Public Citizens’ Democracy Is For People project aims to arm a citizens army with the tools it needs to limit the corrosive impact of money in politics.


Today, the US Supreme Court summarily struck down Montana’s law shielding its elections from the influence of corporate cash. The court’s 5–4 decision in American Tradition Partnership v. Bullock significantly expands the scope and reach of the Citizens United ruling by striking down state limits on corporate spending in state and local elections.

“The question presented in this case is whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law,” the majority wrote. “There can be no serious doubt that it does.” What this means, as John Nichols explains, is that if Exxon Mobil wants to spend $10 million to support a favored candidate in a state legislative or city council race that might decide whether the corporation is regulated, or whether it gets new drilling rights, it can.


What to do? “The court leaves us no choice but to continue to fight for stronger campaign finance laws to prevent corruption,” said Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist with Public Citizen. “We will do this at the congressional level, at administrative agencies and in the states, as well as work to overturn Citizens United by amending the US Constitution.” Public Citizens’ Democracy Is For People project aims to arm a citizens army with the tools it needs to limit the corrosive impact of money in politics. Find out how to plug into the movement and then share this info with friends, family and your Twitter and Facebook communities.


Writing last week, Katrina vanden Heuvel surveyed the Resolutions Week campaign in which city and town councils and state legislatures pushed for a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United. This movement will only grow stronger in the wake of today’s Montana decision.


This video, produced by the Story of Stuff collective, offers an invaluable primer on why the Supreme Court’s closely divided Citizens United decision is incompatible with basic notions of democratic governance.



A weekly guide to meaningful action, this blog connects readers with resources to channel the outrage so many feel after reading about abuses of power and privilege. Far from a comprehensive digest of all worthy groups working on behalf of the social good, Take Action seeks to shine a bright light on one concrete step that Nation readers can take each week. To broaden the conversation, we’ll publish a weekly follow-up post detailing the response and featuring additional campaigns and initiatives that we hope readers will check out. Toward that end, please use the comments field to give us ideas. With your help, we can make real change.

Thank you for reading The Nation

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Ad Policy