Ain’t Nothing Centrist About Them

Ain’t Nothing Centrist About Them

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

At this moment — when 72 percent of the nation supports a public planoption and 14,000 people lose their healthcare every day — the HouseBlue Dogs and conservative Democratic Senators are doing just abouteverything they can to cripple real health care reform.

So why does the media keep ceding them the label of “centrist” or”moderate” as if they are the guardians of mainstream values?

In a recent profile on reform slayer Max Baucus — Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee and creator of his majority Republican “Coalition of the Willing” — Washington Post reporter Dan Eggen refers to Baucus as “a longtime centrist in the Democratic caucus.” Even Harold Meyerson — who along with E.J. Dionne and Ruth Marcus keeps the WashingtonPost op-ed page from being neocon central and is one of the best inthe business at understanding the ideologies at play in Washington — ina recent op-ed repeatedly decries the “centrist Democrats” such as the Blue Dogs who fight against taxing the richest 1 percent of Americans and promote a “can’t-do” view of government.

All Things Considered host Guy Raz recently introduced a story on “forty centrist House Democrats from the so-called Blue Dog Coalition[who] are threatening to block the proposal in its current form….” Healso spoke of “Congressman Mike Ross [who] heads up the Health CareTaskforce for the centrist Blue Dog Democrats.” Want to see how”centrist” Mike Ross is? Check this out.

Even a good regional paper like Louisville’s Courier-Journal–in rightly blasting the Blue Dogs as “deplorable” for being “unable to muster the spine to pay for health care reform with even so innocuous a measure as higher taxes on the richest 1 percent of Americans”–calls them “centrist”.

The danger is that promoting the view that these conservative Democratsare somehow at the center of our politics plays into the hands of thosewho would like to marginalize progressives as far outside of themainstream. (And I have no doubt K Street is advising Republicans toconstantly refer to their Democratic allies as “moderate” and”centrist”.) It also misrepresents what most Americans want from the government in these times.

As Drew Westen, professor of psychology at Emory University, founder ofWesten Strategies, and author of the invaluable The PoliticalBrain, told me: “The average American, according to all availabledata, has largely moved slightly left of where it was in the Reaganyears, and with changing demographics, it will be far left of Reagan andBush in twenty years. So to call Democrats who are substantially right of the center of the electorate (let alone of their party), like HeathShuler, ‘moderates,’ is both to misrepresent the center of politicalgravity in the general electorate and in the Democratic Party.”

How we tell the story of this battle for health care reform matters andwill impact whether the battle is won or lost. So-called “centrists”are far from the center of this debate. They are, in fact, out of touchand out of the mainstream — like the rest of their conservativebrethren.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x