Jonathan Schell: Using Nuclear Energy Is ‘Playing With Fire’

Jonathan Schell: Using Nuclear Energy Is ‘Playing With Fire’

Jonathan Schell: Using Nuclear Energy Is ‘Playing With Fire’

Joining Charlie Rose, Schell explains that nuclear power has no place in a world so vulnerable to widespread disaster.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

As workers struggle to cool the reactors at the Fukushima nuclear plant, Japan’s nuclear agency raised the severity level of the crisis to the same level as 1979’s Three Mile Island incident. Will the US respond to Japan’s disaster by re-examining our own nuclear energy use?

The Nation’s Jonathan Schell, author William Tucker and Michael Levi, director of the program on energy security and climate change at the Council on Foreign Relations, joined Charlie Rose last night to discuss the future of nuclear power in this country and around the world.

With a mix of opinions on the subject—Schell arguing for nuclear abolition, Tucker for expansion and Levi somewhere in the middle—the panel focuses on the crucial question of whether nuclear power even has a place in a world so vulnerable to widespread disaster. According to Schell, the US is “playing with fire” by expanding our nuclear energy use, not only risking an international incident but also opening the spigot for nuclear proliferation.

For more coverage of Japan’s disaster, read Schell’s "From Hiroshima to Fukushima" and go here to view Schell on last night’s Charlie Rose.

—Sara Jerving

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x