On Political Talk Shows, Liberals Can’t Finish Their—

On Political Talk Shows, Liberals Can’t Finish Their—

On Political Talk Shows, Liberals Can’t Finish Their—

Is there data proving that liberals get interrupted more on political television? And who’s fault is that?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Does it ever seem like the liberal guests on political talk shows talk less and get interrupted more?

The halting, dominated liberal pundit is something of a cliché in pop culture, from the fake cable segments on 30 Rock to those subversively accurate Tom Tomorrow cartoons. Even putting aside Fox News, which just added to its in-house stable of repentant Democrats by hiring former Senator Evan Bayh, the more balanced debate shows tend to book more conservative guests, as Media Matters has documented, and then give the liberals a harder time.

I was thinking about this while watching the most recent McLaughlin Group, which pioneered today’s political talk. The show was considered brash, fast and revolutionary when it debuted in 1982. (President Reagan once likened it to Animal House, while toasting its influence.) Since then, of course, the show’s style has spread across cable news, along with its star guests like Pat Buchanan and Lawrence O’Donnell. Nowadays, The McLaughlin Group is almost quaint, prioritizing lengthy policy debates over most horse race crap, and teeing up segments with bright fonts reminiscent of a bake sale flyer. The exchanges are still pretty pointed, though, and while everyone brings their A-game, it feels like the liberal guests must fight harder to get a word in. To test that feeling, we counted up interruptions on the last show. It wasn’t even close.

The liberal guests were interrupted seven times.

The conservative guests were never interrupted successfully. (We counted interruptions as cutting in while a guest was talking and preventing them from continuing. An interjection that didn’t stop someone from talking was not counted.)

In terms of the breakdown, four of the interruptions of the liberal guests, Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift and Washington Post’s Ezra Klein, were by the host, John McLaughlin. Then the conservative guests, MSNBC’s Pat Buchanan and radio commentator Monica Crowley, added a few more interruptions of Klein. Clift was able to fight them off—she’s a veteran—and only succumbed to host-interruptions.

Now, the unavoidable critiques to this bloggy exercise are “Who cares?” since there are way important things happening in the world, and “So what, isn’t the McLaughlin Group always an interrupt-a-thon?

Well, political talk shows have an outsided influence on public debates, so it can matter that a seemingly balanced guest roster is skewed in how guests are treated. As for the second one, yeah, you got us, interruptions are especially intense on the show. In fact, this was a comparitively tame episode. I’ll close with a YouTube mashup someone made of moments in a 2008 show that were almost entirely cross-talk.

Like this blog post? Read it on The Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x