Working Families Still Squeezed

Working Families Still Squeezed

 There were grumblings from all corners of the AFL-CIO at its winter meeting in Orlando recently. "Disappointment", "disillusionment", "unengaged", these words and worse peppered press reports describing labor’s view of President Obama and the Democrats.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

There were grumblings from all corners of the AFL-CIO at its winter meeting in Orlando recently. "Disappointment", "disillusionment", "unengaged", these words and worse peppered press reports describing labor’s view of President Obama and the Democrats.

Organized labor spent $200 million to help elect the president and support of its 15 million members is considered absolutely critical for Democrats to hold the line this November.

The president’s failure to deliver on two key issues: labor law reform and taxing Cadillac health plans, have enraged union members who see cumbersome rules as an impediment to organizing new workplaces and taxes on their hard-won health benefit packages as just plain wrong.

There are plenty of other places to get new tax revenue, as they see it.

While Wall Street continues to show signs of stability–in fact, 2009 was a very profitable year for America’s financial community–Main Street continues to hurt and hurt bad. Bailout money kept Wall Street alive, say unionists, but little of it has made its way to American working families. Many economists now project unemployment above 8% for years to come, with growth in jobs centered in the low-paying service sector, where unions have little presence.

President Obama’s emphasis on renewable energy projects as a source of job creation gets few cheers from labor, who see developments in that sector as very slow-moving: get consumers to buy energy-saving things and the work will follow. That could be years in the making.

What’s to happen to American families in need this year?

We are fast approaching 100 million Americans–one third this country’s population–living at twice the poverty level or less, according to the Brookings’ Institution. That translates into take-home pay of just three thousand dollars a month or less for a family of four. Union Families expect more — and top union officials are already expressing strong concerns — that if they don’t get more, soon — don’t expect them to be able to deliver for Democrats in the fall.

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read, just one of the many incisive, deeply-reported articles we publish daily. Now more than ever, we need fearless journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media.

Throughout this critical election year and a time of media austerity and renewed campus activism and rising labor organizing, independent journalism that gets to the heart of the matter is more critical than ever before. Donate right now and help us hold the powerful accountable, shine a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug, and build a more just and equitable future.

For nearly 160 years, The Nation has stood for truth, justice, and moral clarity. As a reader-supported publication, we are not beholden to the whims of advertisers or a corporate owner. But it does take financial resources to report on stories that may take weeks or months to properly investigate, thoroughly edit and fact-check articles, and get our stories into the hands of readers.

Donate today and stand with us for a better future. Thank you for being a supporter of independent journalism.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x