No Medals for Olympics Opener

No Medals for Olympics Opener

Not to be too tough on the organizers of the opening ceremony of the Vancouver Olympics, but how come someone else had to sing the Leonard Cohen song?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Not to be too tough on the organizers of the opening ceremony of the Vancouver Olympics, but how come someone else had to sing the Leonard Cohen song?

Of course, there was going to be a performance of "Hallelujah," the passable Cohen song that has achieved iconic status thanks to cover versions by Jeff Buckley and so many others.

But why have k.d. lang sing it?

Why not Cohen?

After all, if the Olympics opening ceremonies are about anything akin to cultural authenticity — a suggestion that organizers take seriously, even if savvy critics find it amusing — then any not have the writer and original singer (and the man who, upon his Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction was aptly described by Lou Reed as having entered "highest and most influential echelon of songwriters") of the song perform. True, Cohen is 75 and he’s got an ailing back, but something tells me he could have made it to Vancouver for this show.

His performance, perhaps as a duo with lang (a longtime Cohen fan whose performance Friday night was riveting), would have been far more powerful than what we got.

And what of the obligatory version of "O Canada"? Was it really necessary to have a talented young artist, June Award-winning jazz stylist Nikki Yanofsky," mutate the national anthem into a cringe-worthy power ballad. If the organizers really thought the song needed to be punched up, they should have just gone for it and had Rush perform. (A note here: The full band, not just Geddy Lee.)

Better yet, have Joni Mitchell perform "A Case of You" and then break into "O Canada" where her lyrics reference the song.

Even better, how about War Party morphing their aboriginal hip-hop anthem "This Land Was Ours" into "O Canada"?

That’s probably too political for this Olympics, which is too bad. The cultural highlight of the 2000 Olympics was Midnight Oil’s performance of "Beds Are Burning," their condemnation of land grabs for the Australia’s aboriginal people, which declares: "The time has come to say: ‘fair’s fair,’ to pay the rent, to pay our share…" The band members performed in sweatshirts emblazoned with the word: "Sorry."

For a moment, the Olympic stage was being used to make a statement that was rooted in the history of the host country but meaningful to the whole world.

The question is whether this Olympics will speak with equal authority and power.

There’s still time.

There’s a good case to be made that no songwriter has captured Canada all its strengths, all its failings — better over the years than Bruce Cockburn. His "Stolen Land" offers a powerful echo of Midnight Oil’s "Times Has Come," with a suitably international twist.

Cockburn’s song asks the right questions:

 

If you’re like me you’d like to think we’ve learned from our mistakes

 

Enough to know we can’t play god with others’ lives at stake

So now we’ve all discovered the world wasn’t only made for whites

What step are you gonna take to try and set things right

In this stolen land

 

And it offers an answer: "we’re not through yet."

We’re not through with the Vancouver Olympics yet.

The Olympic Organizers would do well to recognize that they still an opportunity to highlight the most powerful artistry of Canadian songwriters who have so much more to say to the world than what we saw at the opening ceremony.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x