The Massachusetts Lesson: Go Populist Now

The Massachusetts Lesson: Go Populist Now

The Massachusetts Lesson: Go Populist Now

Election results rarely have a single explanation.

Yet it’s pretty clear that Scott Brown’s special election win in a state that last sent a Republican to the Senate in 1978 is an indicator of the turbulent national political mood a year after Obama took office.

There is a generalized anti-establishment anger loose in this country, reinforced by a White House team that has delivered for Wall Street but not enough for hurting communities. It is an anger also fueled by often savage, right-wing anti-government attacks.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Election results rarely have a single explanation.

Yet it’s pretty clear that Scott Brown’s special election win in a state that last sent a Republican to the Senate in 1978 is an indicator of the turbulent national political mood a year after Obama took office.

There is a generalized anti-establishment anger loose in this country, reinforced by a White House team that has delivered for Wall Street but not enough for hurting communities. It is an anger also fueled by often savage, right-wing anti-government attacks.

This special election is a wake up call and should lead to a course correction. The Democratic party can no longer run as a managerial and technocratic party. Going populist is now smart politics and good policy.

The Obama White House needs to show, quickly and forcefully, with concrete, bold and visible action, that it stands with the working people of America. Here’s a symbolic but smart start: jettison those on the White House economic team whose slow, timid response to the crisis of unemployment and to Wall Street’s obscene excesses helped create the conditions for the Tea Party’s inchoate right-wing populism.

Leadership on pro-democracy reforms are also desperately needed to end the corruption of our politics and to stanch the corporate money flooding and deforming of our democracy. Connect the dots for people: explain how needed reforms are gutted when both parties succumb to the pervasive corruption of our money politics. If the GOP’s obstructionism has a silver lining, it is in exposing how an anti-democratic, super-majority filibuster has essentially made our system dysfunctional. There is fertile ground on which to rally people in a transpartisan political reform movement.

Massachusetts offers another lesson: Obama’s decision to demobilize his base in 2009 in favor of an insider approach to governing was a big mistake. I’m not a political strategist, but I don’t know how you win elections by failing to rouse people who’ve worked hardest at the grassroots to get you elected? It is time to re-mobilize the base.

And here’s a no-brainer: Isn’t it time to give up on that faith in genteel post-partisanship when the GOP knifes you at every turn? Nice isn’t going create more jobs or get health care reform.

Before pivoting to a laser-like focus on jobs and the economy, passing the strongest possible healthcare bill as quickly as is feasible is a top priority.There are various procedural options being considered. (Passing the Senate bill followed by changes via budget reconciliation may be a smart and even realistic idea.) Passing a bill won’t be the Democrats’ political salvation–but if Obama and his party fail it would be the most catastrophic legislative failure since 1994 and possibly snuff out any chance for reform in other arenas moving forward.

President Obama warned us that change wouldn’t come easy. Many believe he hasn’t held up his end in fighting hard enough for key progressive priorities.

What comes next will test the President’s willingness to learn the lessons of this last year. Get tough, get bold, kiss “post-partisanship” goodbye and fight hard for jobs and a just economy of shared prosperity. And put yourself squarely back on the side of working people.

President Obama: Don’t pay attention to those who counsel going slow. The only thing you have to fear is caution itself.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x