Willing to Reconsider

Willing to Reconsider

OK, so I’ve been a feminist against marriage for as long as I can remember but I will if you will.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

OK, so I’ve been a feminist against marriage for as long as I can remember but I will if you will.
Here’s the back story on that. I have been in love with my partner Elizabeth for 19 years, maybe more. What’s it mean to be a lesbian? If you’d asked me yesterday I’d have said it was a crazy question. It’s not about "being" something. "It" (in so far as there’s an "it" in the mix,) is about loving someone, another person, in my case, an astonishing woman who flies.

But — and I’m getting to the point — when I read that on the first day of the Proposition 8 Trial, Theodore B. Olson asked his client, "What does it mean to be a lesbian?" I was struck. Right there in federal court, Ted Olson asked his client, Kristin M. Perry, "what does it mean to be a lesbian?" And I found myself saying. "Good for Olson." This trial will make history. I mean, I found myself saying it out loud, and good for Olson’s nothing I’ve ever said before.

In my book, Ted Olson’s the root of no small evil. His argument before the Supremes in Bush vs. Gore stopped the ballot recount in Florida and started the slip-slide into Bushwar. A leader of the creepy Federalist Society, it was with Olson that what beloved Molly Ivins called the Bushwacking began.

So no, I’m not in the habit of praising Ted Olson. To the contrary, I even had a beef with his wife — for her role in the anti-feminist, not-very Independent Women’s Forum.

Yet here I am, saying "good for Ted." And he’s saying yes to David Boies. Eight and a half years after their epic battle over the 2000 election, lawyers Boies and Olson are on the same team challenging the constitutionality of California’s marriage equality ban.

My point is this: I can’t and don’t want to change how I feel about Elizabeth, or marriage, or the stolen election of 2000, but I am willing to reconsider Ted Olson. It’s taken me a while to get here but here it is. The point: I’m willing to reconsider. Are you? If I can reconsider Olson, and Olson can team up with Boies, can you out there, opponents of my equality, listen to Kristen Perry and change your mind about me?

Do I hear you say "I do?" Oh go on.

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x