American Majority Agrees: Afghan War’s Not Worth Fighting

American Majority Agrees: Afghan War’s Not Worth Fighting

American Majority Agrees: Afghan War’s Not Worth Fighting

With record numbers of US troops being killed in Afghanistan, with Pentagon expenditures for the war skyrocketing and with little or no evidence that the US occupation is making the country more stable, safe, free or humane, a majority of Americans now say the war is not worth fighting.

Fifty-one percent of those surveyed for a a new Washington Post-ABC News poll now say the human and economic cost of the war is too great.

Forty-four percent say it is worth its costs.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

With record numbers of US troops being killed in Afghanistan, with Pentagon expenditures for the war skyrocketing and with little or no evidence that the US occupation is making the country more stable, safe, free or humane, a majority of Americans now say the war is not worth fighting.

Fifty-one percent of those surveyed for a a new Washington Post-ABC News poll now say the human and economic cost of the war is too great.

Forty-four percent say it is worth its costs.

Perhaps most significantly, passionate opposition to the war now significantly outstrips passionate support for it.

Forty-one percent of those surveyed said they were strongly opposed to the occupation.

Just 31 percent say they were strongly supportive.

Barack Obama authorized surging 17,000 additional troops into Afghanistan at the start of his presidency, making a commitment to extend an occupation begun by George Bush and Dick Cheney as a supposed effort to track down those responsible for the 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Now, as Afghanistan prepares for presidential elections Thursday, the fighting in many parts of the country is more intense than ever.

There is widespread speculation that General Stanley A. McChrystal, the top US commander in Afghanistan, will request more troops in short order.

That escalation is not going to play well with the American people.

A striking 45 percent said they were opposed to dispatching more US troops to Afghanistan.

Only 24 percent of those surveyed expressed sympathy for McChrystal’s scheme.

What these numbers add up to is an even stronger argument for Congress to check and balance the escalation of a war that should not be extended.

So far, 95 members, including a number of Republicans, have signed on as co-sponsors of Massachusetts Congressman Jim McGovern’s call for the development of an Afghanistan exit strategy.

The August congressional recess provides an opening for antiwar activists to increase those numbers. Progressive Democrats of America is working the issue hard, pushing an “End Wars and Occupations: Redirect Funding” message that is spot on.

“August Recess is the time to act! Congress needs to know that their constituents feel strongly about halting the war in Afghanistan, withdrawing of US troops from Iraq, and reducing the overall size of the military budget,” says PDA executive director Tim Carptenter. “They need to see concerned constituents taking action: Request a meeting with your senators and representative or their staffs, or simply stop by their offices and tell them to vote against further funding and to support the McGovern bill.”

The question to ask of reluctant members of Congress is easy enough: Isn’t it time to side with the majority of Americans in recognizing that this war is not worth fighting?

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x